2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb03199.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Problem‐Based Learning Approach to Integrating Foreign Language Into Engineering

Abstract: Problem‐based learning (PBL) is an instructional methodology placing primary emphasis on students solving realistic problems in a team‐oriented environment. Here we discuss using PBL to integrate a language for specific purposes (LSP) track into an undergraduate biological engineering curriculum as a way to prepare students for an engineering career requiring job‐specific foreign language skills. In Part I we review PBL theory and anticipate problems that may arise when merging it with an LSP track. In Part II… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, there is even less research on the Connections standard in higher education, although a study of pre-collegelevel learners (Pessoa, Hendry, Donato, Tucker, & Lee, 2007) suggests that in content-based instruction, a balance of academic content and focus on the language on the part of the instructor leads to gains in students' linguistic proficiency. At the college level, programs that combine foreign language instruction with another discipline (content-based instruction) are relatively rare, although there is evidence that such programs lead to increased interest in language learning, as well as prepare students, whatever their area of specialization, to work in a global society (Dupuy, 2000;Hoecherl-Alden, 2000;Neville & Britt, 2007). The success of our project shows that implementing an interdisciplinary, content-based approach to language learning (the Connections Standard) and linking students to communities speaking the target language (the Communities Standard) lead naturally to the kinds of cultural and linguistic comparisons advocated by the Comparisons Standard.…”
Section: Implementing the Standards In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, there is even less research on the Connections standard in higher education, although a study of pre-collegelevel learners (Pessoa, Hendry, Donato, Tucker, & Lee, 2007) suggests that in content-based instruction, a balance of academic content and focus on the language on the part of the instructor leads to gains in students' linguistic proficiency. At the college level, programs that combine foreign language instruction with another discipline (content-based instruction) are relatively rare, although there is evidence that such programs lead to increased interest in language learning, as well as prepare students, whatever their area of specialization, to work in a global society (Dupuy, 2000;Hoecherl-Alden, 2000;Neville & Britt, 2007). The success of our project shows that implementing an interdisciplinary, content-based approach to language learning (the Connections Standard) and linking students to communities speaking the target language (the Communities Standard) lead naturally to the kinds of cultural and linguistic comparisons advocated by the Comparisons Standard.…”
Section: Implementing the Standards In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Years later Maastricht University (The Netherlands) became the second university in the world to employ it for its medical program (Smith et al, 2005;Bouhuijs, 2011). Nowadays, it has spread in engineering (Savery, 2006;Machika and Abrahams, 2014), architecture (Kingsland, 1989;Bridges, 2007), nursing and business (Rideout and Carpio, 2001), teacher education (Hmelo-Silver, 2004), and language learning (Neville and Britt, 2007;Andreu-Andrés and García-Casas, 2010) among other disciplines.…”
Section: Revista Complutense De Educaciónmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In problem based learning, students work in cooperative groups to solve problems from daily life (Neville & Britt, 2007). These groups receive problem situations with scenarios about real life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%