“…In addition to the aforementioned popular classic methods, there are some other classic theories and their improved methods: models based on modifying life-curve (Hashin and Rotem, 1978; Subramanyan, 1976); energy-based damage theories (Golos and Ellyin, 1987; Kreiser et al., 2007; Meneghetti, 2007; Niu, 1987; Niu et al., 1987; Scott-Emuakpor et al., 2008; Zhu and Huang, 2010; Zhu et al., 2011a, 2012b); continuum damage mechanics approaches (Besson, 2010; Chaboche and Lesne 1988; Chaboche, 1974; Chow and Wei, 1991; Grammenoudis et al., 2009a, 2009b; Lemaitre and Plumtree, 1979; Oller et al., 2005; Tikri et al., 2014; Van Do et al., 2015; Wang, 1992; Yuan et al., 2013; Zhan et al., 2016); damage theories based on physical property degradation (Cheng and Plumtree, 1998; Lv et al., 2015; Seweryn et al., 2008; Shang and Yao, 1999; Ye and Wang, 2001; Yuan et al., 2015); ductility exhaustion based methods (Goswami, 2004; Hales, 1983; Priest and Ellison, 1981; Zhu et al., 2011b, 2012a, 2013); and thermodynamic entropy based damage theories (Macha et al., 2006; Marco and Starkey, 1954; Naderi et al., 2010). With the development and application of new technology and new theory, many new predicting methods are presented for the modern situation: probability prediction method (Grell and Laz, 2010; Larin and Vodka, 2015; Li et al., 2012; Ontiveros et al., 2010; Rathod et al., 2011; Xie et al., 2015); root mean square model (Kim et al. 2006); methodology using ent...…”