2006
DOI: 10.1504/ijttc.2006.008651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic switch model of information flow in social networks: application of virtual circuits to organisational design

Abstract: Network building and exchange of information by people within networks is crucial to the innovation process. Contrary to older models, in social networks the flow of information is noncontinuous and nonlinear. There are critical barriers to information flow that operate in a probabilistic manner. New models and new analytic tools are needed for these systems. This paper introduces the concept of virtual circuits and draws on recent concepts of network modelling and design to introduce a probabilistic switch th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firms with more alliance experience are more likely to form new alliances (Gulati, 1998). Hagedoorn et al (2006) observed through analysis of 1,325 R&D alliances in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, that firms with more R&D alliances experience tends to be located in the central node of subsequent alliance networks, has higher social status and increases probabilities to find better alliance partners (Barnard et al, 2006). Social network is a key driver to prompting firms to enter into strategic alliances, as is highlighted by Dana et al (2008) who shows that internationalisation and expanding entrepreneurial terrain of SMEs requires more expanded networks [originally termed as 'multi-polar internationalisation', see Dana et al (2008) and Wright and Dana, (2003)].…”
Section: Social Network and Alliance Partner Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firms with more alliance experience are more likely to form new alliances (Gulati, 1998). Hagedoorn et al (2006) observed through analysis of 1,325 R&D alliances in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, that firms with more R&D alliances experience tends to be located in the central node of subsequent alliance networks, has higher social status and increases probabilities to find better alliance partners (Barnard et al, 2006). Social network is a key driver to prompting firms to enter into strategic alliances, as is highlighted by Dana et al (2008) who shows that internationalisation and expanding entrepreneurial terrain of SMEs requires more expanded networks [originally termed as 'multi-polar internationalisation', see Dana et al (2008) and Wright and Dana, (2003)].…”
Section: Social Network and Alliance Partner Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%