2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic risk assessment approach used to prioritize chemical constituents in mainstream smoke of cigarettes sold in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these values appear low as compared to maximum allowable inhalation based on OSHA's PEL, a number of studies (Cunningham et al, 2011; Xie et al, 2012; Baumung et al, 2016) utilizing the margin of exposure (MOE) approach (i.e., ratio of the toxicological threshold determined from various data bases to the estimated human intake; where compounds with MOE values less than 10,000 are considered high risk), determine both Cd and As to present considerable health related risks to the consumer; more so for Cd than As. On the other hand, while the maximum allowable inhalation of Ni, based on OSHA's PEL, from ECIG-generated aerosol was higher than the maximum allowable inhalation of Cd and As in mainstream smoke, Xie et al (2012), using the MOE approach, determined Ni in cigarette smoke to be less concerning than either Cd or As. Determining the likelihood of detrimental pathology occurring from individual constituents of ECIG-generated aerosol using the MOE approach is both intriguing and appealing, particularly for the proponents of harm reduction, since a MOE value could be used as an alternative means of comparing the relative amount of harm associated with “vaping” vs. smoking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…While these values appear low as compared to maximum allowable inhalation based on OSHA's PEL, a number of studies (Cunningham et al, 2011; Xie et al, 2012; Baumung et al, 2016) utilizing the margin of exposure (MOE) approach (i.e., ratio of the toxicological threshold determined from various data bases to the estimated human intake; where compounds with MOE values less than 10,000 are considered high risk), determine both Cd and As to present considerable health related risks to the consumer; more so for Cd than As. On the other hand, while the maximum allowable inhalation of Ni, based on OSHA's PEL, from ECIG-generated aerosol was higher than the maximum allowable inhalation of Cd and As in mainstream smoke, Xie et al (2012), using the MOE approach, determined Ni in cigarette smoke to be less concerning than either Cd or As. Determining the likelihood of detrimental pathology occurring from individual constituents of ECIG-generated aerosol using the MOE approach is both intriguing and appealing, particularly for the proponents of harm reduction, since a MOE value could be used as an alternative means of comparing the relative amount of harm associated with “vaping” vs. smoking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[15][16][17] The BZ exposure from smoking was calculated for each smoker in accordance with the estimated average BZ concentration of 97.9 mg per domestic cigarette. 13 Within the context of job category, the study participants were classified into the exposed and the control. Although the controls were persons without direct exposure to BZ due to performing their job, they could still be indirectly exposed to BZ, including from their work environment and smoking.…”
Section: Bz Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gas phase constituents in mainstream tobacco smoke contribute heavily towards tobacco smoke cancer risk indices (16-17). Benzene occurs in large quantities in tobacco smoke, is a known human carcinogen, and is associated with leukemia in smokers (18-19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%