The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1002/etep.668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic neural network classifier-based method for transformer winding fault identification through its transfer function measurement

Abstract: SUMMARY In this paper, a new method is introduced for identification of transformer winding fault through transfer function analysis. For this analysis, vector fitting and probabilistic neural network are used. The results of transfer functions estimation through vector fitting are employed for training of neural network, and consequently, probabilistic neural network is used for classification of faults. The required data for fault type identification are obtained by measurements on two groups of transformers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first category includes methods according to which faults' classification is solely based on the rate of variations in numerical indices (statistical and mathematical indices) in specific frequency ranges [9]- [18]. The second category includes methods that use intelligent classifiers to distinguish faults [19]- [25]. In these methods, the necessary features of frequency response (mainly the statistical and numerical indices) are extracted, and these features are used for training and testing classifiers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first category includes methods according to which faults' classification is solely based on the rate of variations in numerical indices (statistical and mathematical indices) in specific frequency ranges [9]- [18]. The second category includes methods that use intelligent classifiers to distinguish faults [19]- [25]. In these methods, the necessary features of frequency response (mainly the statistical and numerical indices) are extracted, and these features are used for training and testing classifiers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], [20], based on the TF estimation with the help of vector fitting, the necessary features of the measured TFs for four faults AD, RD, DSV, and SC were extracted and these faults are classified by using PNN [19] and SVM [20]. A distinction has been made between electrical and mechanical faults (AD and RD only) and the inrush current through ANN and the DT in [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to interpreting FRA data has been the application of Black Box modelling [17][18][19]. This approach is based on the development of mathematical models which accurately represent the frequency response between various terminal combinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any change in the FRA will result in model parameter changes which can then be interpreted for indications of a structural change within the transformer. Researchers such as Bigdeli [18, 19] have used neural networks to classify the fault relative to the change in parameters. Such an approach is dependent upon training data for different transformer topologies and their corresponding fault conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At high current values, these induced currents cause overheating of the metal structure, which can degrade the properties of transformer oil, damage the painting of the tank, and damage the insulation of nearby cables . All these harms can be a cause of major fault in power transformers .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%