2015
DOI: 10.1101/gr.192336.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic method for testing and estimating selection differences between populations

Abstract: Human populations around the world encounter various environmental challenges and, consequently, develop genetic adaptations to different selection forces. Identifying the differences in natural selection between populations is critical for understanding the roles of specific genetic variants in evolutionary adaptation. Although numerous methods have been developed to detect genetic loci under recent directional selection, a probabilistic solution for testing and quantifying selection differences between popul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…90 Our work demonstrates the advantages of comparing closely related populations in very large sample sizes to detect subtle signals of selection, whereas very recent studies applying related methods to smaller sample sizes detected genome-wide significant signals only at previously known loci. 91,92 In particular, we detected genome-wide significant evidence of selection in Europeans at ADH1B, which was previously reported to be under selection in East Asian populations 14,55,57,58 using REHH 61 (which can detect only rela-A B C Figure 3. Power of PC-Based Selection Statistic The allele frequency difference at selected SNPs was varied between two populations separated by varying F ST .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…90 Our work demonstrates the advantages of comparing closely related populations in very large sample sizes to detect subtle signals of selection, whereas very recent studies applying related methods to smaller sample sizes detected genome-wide significant signals only at previously known loci. 91,92 In particular, we detected genome-wide significant evidence of selection in Europeans at ADH1B, which was previously reported to be under selection in East Asian populations 14,55,57,58 using REHH 61 (which can detect only rela-A B C Figure 3. Power of PC-Based Selection Statistic The allele frequency difference at selected SNPs was varied between two populations separated by varying F ST .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In contrast to previous work on detecting selection using PCs 63,80 or using the spatial ancestry analysis (SPA) method 81 , our statistic is able to detect signals at genome-wide significance, a key consideration in genome scans for selection 82 . Our work demonstrates the advantages of comparing closely related populations in very large sample sizes to detect novel loci, whereas very recent studies applying related methods to smaller sample sizes detected genome-wide significant signals only at previously known loci 83,84 . In particular, we detected genome-wide significant evidence of selection in Europeans at the ADH1B locus, which was previously reported to be under selection in East Asian populations 14,46,48,49 using REHH 53 (which can only detect relatively recent signals and does not work on standing variation 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…SeleDiff implements a probabilistic method from our previous study (He et al, 2015). In this approach, we introduced logarithm odds ratios of allele frequencies to measure differences in selective pressures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%