2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-017-1204-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic method for evaluating wedge stability based on blind data theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the efficiency and accuracy of the JDRV method for determining the PDF of the safety factor, a rock wedge example described by Ma et al (2019) is presented. In the example, the wedge has a height of 33 m and a slope angle of 65 .…”
Section: Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess the efficiency and accuracy of the JDRV method for determining the PDF of the safety factor, a rock wedge example described by Ma et al (2019) is presented. In the example, the wedge has a height of 33 m and a slope angle of 65 .…”
Section: Illustrative Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars have devoted a great number of contributions to developing the probabilistic method for analysing the stability of a rock wedge. In summary, these methods can presumably be classified into four main types: the blind data theory (Ma et al 2019), Monte Carlo simulations (MCs) (Park and West 2001;Li et al 2009a, 2009b), the point estimate method (PEM) (Park et al 2012), and the first-order reliability method (FORM) (Low 1997;Jimenez-Rodriguez and Sitar 2007;Lee et al 2012). Theoretically, some disadvantages may be associated with these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lithology controls the stability of the slope and determines the amount of material that is available for debris flow [ 46 , 47 ]. According to the anti-weathering ability of rock, the lithology was divided into four types: soil, soft rock, hard rock and extremely hard rock.…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In bivariate statistical analysis, the weights of the landslide conditioning factors are assigned based on landslide density using different methods-including frequency ratio (FR) [13,15,[20][21][22], the information content model (ICM) [23,24], weight of evidence (WoE) [16], certainty factors (CF) [25], favorability functions (FF) [26], and the likelihood ratio model (LRM) [27]. The multivariate statistical methods evaluate the combined relationship between a dependent variable (landslide occurrence) and a series of independent variables (landslide controlling factors), and the most popular methods to analyze the resulting matrix include logistic regression (LR) [6,13,[28][29][30][31][32][33], discriminant analysis (DA) [34,35], random forest (RF) [36][37][38] and active learning statistical analysis, such as the artificial neural networks (ANNs) [3,6,[39][40][41][42].Physically based methods, such as deterministic techniques, are based on mathematical modeling of the physical mechanisms controlling slope failure [43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. However, it is reported that the methods are only applicable over large areas when the geological and geomorphological conditions are fairly homogeneous and the landslide types are simple [17].Moreover, several studies have used two or more models to produce landslide susceptibi...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physically based methods, such as deterministic techniques, are based on mathematical modeling of the physical mechanisms controlling slope failure [43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. However, it is reported that the methods are only applicable over large areas when the geological and geomorphological conditions are fairly homogeneous and the landslide types are simple [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%