2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Probabilistic Graphical Model-Based Approach for the Label Ranking Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we describe the scheme proposed in the preliminary (conference) version of this study [ 23 ], based on the learning process used in [ 36 ] and which basically wraps the EM method for parameter estimation. In Algorithm 1, we show our adaptation from the NB estimation algorithm [ 31 ] to the LR problem.…”
Section: Hidden Naive Bayes For Label Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…First, we describe the scheme proposed in the preliminary (conference) version of this study [ 23 ], based on the learning process used in [ 36 ] and which basically wraps the EM method for parameter estimation. In Algorithm 1, we show our adaptation from the NB estimation algorithm [ 31 ] to the LR problem.…”
Section: Hidden Naive Bayes For Label Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained in [ 23 ] shed light on certain drawbacks. The main one is that the algorithm reaches the stopping condition too soon, which results in a small number of components for the mixture.…”
Section: Hidden Naive Bayes For Label Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let us briefly mention some of these. The first group is formed by methods based on directly adapting well‐known machine learning algorithms, such as decision trees , 10 instance‐based learners , 10,22 probabilistic models , 22,23 association rules , 24 and neural networks ( multilayer perceptron ) 25 . The second group includes methods based on the transformation of the whole problem into a set of single‐class classifiers (e.g., labelwise , 26,27 pairwise approaches, 28,29 or chain classifiers 30 ).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%