2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88690-7_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Probabilistic Cascade of Detectors for Individual Object Recognition

Abstract: Abstract.A probabilistic system for recognition of individual objects is presented. The objects to recognize are composed of constellations of features, and features from a same object share the common reference frame of the image in which they are detected. Features appearance and pose are modeled by probabilistic distributions, the parameters of which are shared across features in order to allow training from few examples.In order to avoid an expensive combinatorial search, our recognition system is organize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computation might be organized as a tree, for example to search simultaneously for multiple objects or to postpone decisions about pose or identity by exploring multiple branches, or as a cascade, which might be suitable for single objects and limited pose variation. The computational advantages are well documented, both from a practical and a theoretical standpoint (Fleuret and Geman 2001;Viola and Jones 2001;Moreels and Perona 2008;Blanchard and Geman 2005;Amit and Trouvé 2010).…”
Section: Matching Templates Versus Matching Partsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Computation might be organized as a tree, for example to search simultaneously for multiple objects or to postpone decisions about pose or identity by exploring multiple branches, or as a cascade, which might be suitable for single objects and limited pose variation. The computational advantages are well documented, both from a practical and a theoretical standpoint (Fleuret and Geman 2001;Viola and Jones 2001;Moreels and Perona 2008;Blanchard and Geman 2005;Amit and Trouvé 2010).…”
Section: Matching Templates Versus Matching Partsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This problem is recognized as difficult, especially under severe viewpoint changes between images. This is a fundamental step in many computer vision and image processing applications such as scene recognition [73,7,66,12,44,65,74,21,79,45] and detection [18,51], object tracking [81], robot localization [67,72,48,5,52], image stitching [2,6], image registration [78,30] and retrieval [22,20], 3D modeling and reconstruction [15,19,75,1,57], motion estimation [76], photo management [68,77,27,9], symmetry detection [32] or even image forgeries detection [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%