2020
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Probabilistic Approach to Explore Signal Execution Mechanisms With Limited Experimental Data

Abstract: Mathematical models of biochemical reaction networks are central to the study of dynamic cellular processes and hypothesis generation that informs experimentation and validation. Unfortunately, model parameters are often not available and sparse experimental data leads to challenges in model calibration and parameter estimation. This can in turn lead to unreliable mechanistic interpretations of experimental data and the generation of poorly conceived hypotheses for experimental validation. To address this chal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) Consensus across the field led to labeling SCLC phenotypic subtypes by the dominant transcription factor expressed in that subtype. (4) Subtype with transcriptional signature intermediate between NE and Non-NE, named SCLC-A2. (5) Phenotypic transitions occur in a hierarchical manner from SCLC-A to SCLC-N to SCLC-Y cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Consensus across the field led to labeling SCLC phenotypic subtypes by the dominant transcription factor expressed in that subtype. (4) Subtype with transcriptional signature intermediate between NE and Non-NE, named SCLC-A2. (5) Phenotypic transitions occur in a hierarchical manner from SCLC-A to SCLC-N to SCLC-Y cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated parameter values using PyDREAM, 48 a Python implementation of the DiffeRential E volution A daptive M etropolis (DREAM) method. 80 We utilized pMLKL Western blot data at the two highest TNF doses (100 and 10 ng/ml) and defined a multi-objective cost function, where Θ is the parameter set, x m ( t,d ) and x e ( t,d ) are model-predicted and experimentally measured pMLKL concentrations, respectively, at time t and TNF dose d , and σ ( t ) = 0.1· x e ( t,d ) (following previous studies 49,81,82 ). Parameter sampling was performed using five Monte Carlo chains, each run for 50,000 iterations, the first 25,000 of which were considered burn-in and discarded, resulting in 125,000 parameter sets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Q is the parameter set, xm(t,d) and xe(t,d) are model-predicted and experimentally measured pMLKL concentrations, respectively, at time t and TNF dose d, and s(t) = 0.1×xe(t,d) (following previous studies 49,81,82 ). Parameter sampling was performed using five Monte Carlo chains, each run for 50,000 iterations, the first 25,000 of which were considered burn-in and discarded, resulting in 125,000 parameter sets.…”
Section: Bayesian Parameter Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lessons from e.g. hydrology and climate modeling have been highly influential toward addressing these issues [20*,42,43].…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%