2005
DOI: 10.1214/105051605000000494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic analysis of some tree algorithms

Abstract: In this paper a general class of tree algorithms is analyzed. It is shown that, by using an appropriate probabilistic representation of the quantities of interest, the asymptotic behavior of these algorithms can be obtained quite easily without resorting to the usual complex analysis techniques. This approach gives a unified probabilistic treatment of these questions. It simplifies and extends some of the results known in this domain.Comment: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/105051605000000494 in the A… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Asymptotic behavior of algorithms with an underlying tree structure has been extensively investigated, see Flajolet et al [6], Mohamed and Robert [10] and Mahmoud [8] for a general presentation. By using the terminology of Flajolet et al [6], for non-negative sequences (λ n ) and (µ n ), a series like…”
Section: A Convergence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymptotic behavior of algorithms with an underlying tree structure has been extensively investigated, see Flajolet et al [6], Mohamed and Robert [10] and Mahmoud [8] for a general presentation. By using the terminology of Flajolet et al [6], for non-negative sequences (λ n ) and (µ n ), a series like…”
Section: A Convergence Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The renewal structure of split trees. Renewal theory has already been used for studying random trees in [26,28,32,42,43]. The present paper is another example of its wide applicability.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Even in a fixed class R z , not all the nodes have the same cardinality n r . So, in order to estimate the expected value in (42) we need the following lemma that quantifies the discrepancy of E[Ψ(T n )] under small variations of n. Proof. From the iterative construction, we clearly have E[ Ψ(T n+K )] ≥ E[ Ψ(T n )]; so it suffices to bound the increase in path length when adding K extra items to the tree T n .…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If another collision occurs in a subgroup, this subgroup will split again and the process continues in the same manner until all contentions are resolved. Tree algorithm described above is proved that it is stable for a sufficiently small number of users [10]. However, it becomes less effective when there are a large number of users competing for channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%