Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Security of Information and Networks 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2659651.2659706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Privacy-Preserving E-Ticketing System for Public Transportation Supporting Fine-Granular Billing and Local Validation

Abstract: Next generation systems for public transportation based on e-ticketing offer numerous advantages both for end users and providers of transportation service. At the same time, individuals using such systems tend to leave ubiquitous digital traces which raises serious concerns over privacy. This paper focuses on this issue and presents a framework for constructing privacy-preserving e-ticketing systems for public transportation. What differentiates our solution from other research contributions and real-world sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any other provider should neither learn a ticket's details nor a customer's identity (Customer -Unrelated Provider Privacy, C-UP Privacy). While previous work [19]- [21] has proposed ticketing systems that consider privacy more comprehensively, our problem statement includes ticket sale as well as revenue allocation, and the PCN-based approach presented below is decentralized.…”
Section: Payment Redistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any other provider should neither learn a ticket's details nor a customer's identity (Customer -Unrelated Provider Privacy, C-UP Privacy). While previous work [19]- [21] has proposed ticketing systems that consider privacy more comprehensively, our problem statement includes ticket sale as well as revenue allocation, and the PCN-based approach presented below is decentralized.…”
Section: Payment Redistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These schemes can implement anonymity, de-anonymity, ticket unlinkability and ticket untransferability, but, unlike our scheme, they do not support privacy-preserving attribute-based ticketing. While Gudymenko in [10] addressed user privacy as well as differently priced tickets in his e-ticket scheme and used group signatures to make tickets unlinkable, no formal security models and security proofs were presented.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a disable passenger might need to reveal more details about his disability to the ticket issuer or verifier than necessary for purchasing or verifying a ticket. Gudymenko [10] and Kerschbaum et al [11] addressed this issue, but their schemes were not proven formally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paper tickets are replaced by electronic counterparts. The places as London, San Paulo, Singaporeand others already use e-tickets for a while [10]. Usually the RFID technology is used and e-ticket or multiple ticket information is included into separate smartcard.…”
Section: E-ticket Lifecycle and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%