2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

〈a〉 Prismatic, 〈a〉 basal, and 〈c+a〉 slip strengths of commercially pure Zr by micro-cantilever tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
9
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, by considering a prismatic slip system as the main deformation mechanism in α-Zr layers ( = 0.15 GPa) [84], = 0.075 GPa and = 0.42 GPa, a = 2 GPa is calculated, which matches reasonably well the measured strength.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, by considering a prismatic slip system as the main deformation mechanism in α-Zr layers ( = 0.15 GPa) [84], = 0.075 GPa and = 0.42 GPa, a = 2 GPa is calculated, which matches reasonably well the measured strength.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…7a). Gong et al [84] investigated the strength of different slip systems in single crystal pure α-Zr by microcantilever bending tests. Prismatic slip was found to be the most easy slip system with a critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) of ~ 153 MPa.…”
Section: Deformed Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current approaches include using a final low current milling step404142, low energy ion milling4344 or flash polishing45 in order to “clean” FIB-damaged surfaces. The techniques presented here enable 3D measurements of the complex strain fields caused by FIB-milling and would as such allow a detailed assessment of the effectiveness of these approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the prefactors q g b i 2 m capture the density of glissile dislocations q g , their Burgers vector b i , and the dislocation jump frequency m. Many of the required properties are now directly measurable through the use of micromechanical tests. 24 Mechanical testing was performed on single-crystal CMSX4, oligocrystal MAR-002, and powder metallurgy FGH96 and RR1000 Ni-based superalloys under three-point bend testing, which focuses the maximum tensile stress at a known location for HR-DIC and HR-EBSD analyses.…”
Section: Characterization Modeling and Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%