2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08637-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A primer on selecting grain boundary sets for comparison of interfacial fracture properties in molecular dynamics simulations

Abstract: All grain boundaries are not equal in their predisposition for fracture due to the complex coupling between lattice geometry, interfacial structure, and mechanical properties. The ability to understand these relationships is crucial to engineer materials resilient to grain boundary fracture. Here, a methodology is presented to isolate the role of grain boundary structure on interfacial fracture properties, such as the tensile strength and work of separation, using atomistic simulations. Instead of constructing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the symmetry of the grain boundaries constructed, this value is identical in the two grains for all boundaries studied here; however, for more general boundaries, the value of each and/or the ratio between them could likely be used as additional descriptors. The next seven macroscopic descriptors are an extension of those proposed by Dingreville et al for the study of grain boundaries. Six of these relate to the Schmid factor, another important factor in the failure of grain boundaries, as it represents which slip system will have the largest resolved shear stress. where ϕ and λ are the angles between the direction of loading with the plane and vector, respectively, under consideration.…”
Section: Descriptor Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the symmetry of the grain boundaries constructed, this value is identical in the two grains for all boundaries studied here; however, for more general boundaries, the value of each and/or the ratio between them could likely be used as additional descriptors. The next seven macroscopic descriptors are an extension of those proposed by Dingreville et al for the study of grain boundaries. Six of these relate to the Schmid factor, another important factor in the failure of grain boundaries, as it represents which slip system will have the largest resolved shear stress. where ϕ and λ are the angles between the direction of loading with the plane and vector, respectively, under consideration.…”
Section: Descriptor Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the macroscopic level, these descriptors include degrees of freedom that characterize the crystallography and compatibility conditions of the adjoining grains. 24,25 At the microscopic level, these descriptors categorize the atomic configuration and local environment of the grain boundary region, including, for instance, commonneighbor analysis (CNA), 26 polyhedral template matching, 27 Voronoi-cell topology, 28 or the Smooth Overlap of Atomic Positions (SOAP) formalism. 29−31 The SOAP descriptor is particularly well-suited to describe and compare grain boundary structures because it is invariant with respect to structural symmetries, rotations, and permutations, and it smoothly varies while accommodating structural perturbations.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful implementation of machine learning algorithms requires a set of macroscopic and microscopic descriptors to accurately predict grain boundary properties. At the macroscopic level, these descriptors include degrees of freedom that characterize the crystallography and compatibility conditions of the adjoining grains. , At the microscopic level, these descriptors categorize the atomic configuration and local environment of the grain boundary region, including, for instance, common-neighbor analysis (CNA), polyhedral template matching, Voronoi-cell topology, or the Smooth Overlap of Atomic Positions (SOAP) formalism. The SOAP descriptor is particularly well-suited to describe and compare grain boundary structures because it is invariant with respect to structural symmetries, rotations, and permutations, and it smoothly varies while accommodating structural perturbations. Recent studies ,, have used the SOAP formalism to quantify and connect the atomic and crystallographic structures of single-element grain boundaries in their minimum energy configurations to properties such as grain boundary energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on atomistic simulations, several computational efforts have focused on the hydrogen segregation and diffusion properties and embrittlement consequences for some selected grain boundary in nickel 19 , 38 57 . Classically, the grain boundaries are characterized by their energy, excess volume and geometric parameters such as Coincidence Site Lattice; easily accessible data using density functional theory (DFT) or molecular dynamics (MD) simulations 58 , 59 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%