2014
DOI: 10.1057/9781137317940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Primer for Spatial Econometrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
97
0
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
97
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…For further details see table 2. After normalization the set of indicators was weighted because the different sub-indices determine the territorial capital with different weight (Arbia, 2006). Subsequently the figures were corrected with the method of penalty for bottleneck.…”
Section: The Model Of Territorial Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further details see table 2. After normalization the set of indicators was weighted because the different sub-indices determine the territorial capital with different weight (Arbia, 2006). Subsequently the figures were corrected with the method of penalty for bottleneck.…”
Section: The Model Of Territorial Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason is the availability of more complete data sets in which units characterized by spatial features are observed over time. In general, a spatial panel data set contains more information and less multicollinearity among the variables than a cross-section spatial counterpart -see Anselin (1988Anselin ( , 2010, Elhorst (2014b) and Arbia (2014) for an introduction to this literature.…”
Section: Spatial Panelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) where λ (1) < · · · < λ (n) are the ordered eigenvalues of W (Banerjee et al (2014), Arbia (2014)). …”
Section: Spatial Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%