Background:
Ecuador’s caesarean delivery rate far exceeds that recommended by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and the World Health Organization (WHO). Using data from three iterations of Ecuador’s nationally representative, population-based survey Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición (ENSANUT/ENDEMAIN), spanning 23 years, this study aims to compare mode of delivery outcomes by sociodemographics and labor and delivery (L&D) care institution in light of Ecuador’s major healthcare reform over the past two decades.
Methods:
Using data from the 1994, 2004, and 2012 iterations of the dataset, descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate trends in caesarean delivery based on province, year, and institution of L&D care. Logistic regression was used to test the odds of caesarean delivery based on institution of L&D care, sociodemographics, and pregnancy and birth complications. Predicted probabilities were derived from this model.
Results:
Ecuador’s rate of caesarean delivery increased from 22% in 1989 to 41% in 2012. Each year, the predicted probability of delivering by caesarean is highest in private institutions and those covered by insurance, and from 2008 to 2012, the predicted probability of delivering by caesarean in private centers is significantly higher than that in public centers. Sociodemographic characteristics also predicted risk of caesarean delivery.
Conclusions:
In order to decrease the adverse effects of caesarean delivery for women and their babies, caesarean delivery without medical indication should be reduced. Future research should investigate how mothers perceive delivering by caesarean and how medical indication is defined and used within health centers.