2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.03.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pressure drop study for packed bed adsorption thermal energy storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aaron [42] experimentally confirmed that the effect of a pressure drop was negligible on process performance in the flow regime; namely, the pressure drop concerns were not reasonable for small-scale air separation processes using similar column lengths (9.8-19.6 cm) and particle sizes (0.5 mm). When considering the energy consumption of the process, the pressure drop model is a key concern, since a higher pressure drop leads to a lower energy-storage efficiency [43]. The Darcy model assumes that the pressure drop is proportional to the flow rate, as expressed by Equation (5).…”
Section: Pressure-drop Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aaron [42] experimentally confirmed that the effect of a pressure drop was negligible on process performance in the flow regime; namely, the pressure drop concerns were not reasonable for small-scale air separation processes using similar column lengths (9.8-19.6 cm) and particle sizes (0.5 mm). When considering the energy consumption of the process, the pressure drop model is a key concern, since a higher pressure drop leads to a lower energy-storage efficiency [43]. The Darcy model assumes that the pressure drop is proportional to the flow rate, as expressed by Equation (5).…”
Section: Pressure-drop Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important observation was noticed in the pressure drop measured across the bed during the breakthrough experiment. In separation processes, pressure drop is of great importance, as high pressure drop could lead to increase in power consumption and consequently, decrease in energy efficiency [52]. Owing to the macroporous spatial skeleton present in the Mg-MOF-74@MS composite, a significant decline in pressure drop of around 10 times in comparison to Mg-MOF-74 pellets and around 200 times with respect to the packed bed of Mg-MOF-74 powder was seen (S.I., Section S4).…”
Section: Separation Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practical aspects such as mass transport, thermal conduction, dispersion phenomena at bed scale and volume change are important parameters to be considered [20]. Fixed bed systems generally suffer high pressure drop through the bed, reducing potential GTLS and requiring high parasitic power consumption [50]. In the desorption process, the complete sorbent bed is heated and has to be maintained at a material specific desorption temperature in order to reach the desired charged state [51].…”
Section: Fixed Processmentioning
confidence: 99%