A presentation of Attentional Semantics

Abstract

The paper presents the two main assumptions of Attentional Semantics--(A) and (B), and its main aim (C). (A) Conscious experience is determined by attention: there cannot be consciousness without attention. Consciousness is explained as the product of attentional activity. Attentional activity can be performed thanks to a special kind of energy: nervous energy. This energy is supplied by the organ of attention. When we perform attentional activity, we use our nervous energy. This activity directly affects the organ of attention, causing a variation in the state of the nervous energy. This variation constitutes the phenomenal aspect of consciousness. (B) Words are tools to pilot attention. The meanings of words isolate, de-contextualize, "freeze" and classify in an articulated system the ever-changing and multiform stream of our conscious experiences. Each meaning is composed of the sequence of invariable elements that, independently of any individual occurrence of a given conscious experience, are responsible for the production of any instance of that conscious experience. The elements composing the meanings of words are attentional operations: each word conveys the condensed instructions on the attentional operations one has to perform if one wants to consciously experience what is expressed through and by it. (C) Attentional Semantics aims at finding the attentional instruction conveyed by the meanings of words. To achieve this goal, it tries: (1) to identify the sequence of the elementary conscious experiences that invariably accompany, and are prompted by, the use of the word being analyzed; (2) to describe these conscious experiences in terms of the attentional operations that are responsible for their production; and (3) to identify the unconscious and non-conscious operations that, directly or indirectly, serve either as the support that makes it possible for the attentional operations to take place, be completed, and occur in a certain way, or as the necessary complement that makes it possible to execute and implement the activities determined and triggered by the conscious experiences. The origins of Attentional Semantics are also presented, and the methodological problems researchers encounter when analyzing meanings in attentional terms are discussed. Finally, a brief comparison with the other kinds of semantics is made.

Operational Noology as a new methodology for the study of thought and language: theoretical aspects and possible practical applications

“…3 This substantial diversity from the whole philosophical tradition is, however, essentially real: Ceccato's thought presents vague analogies with only part of Kant's philosophy and with the operationalism of H. Dingler and that of P. Bridgman. 4 For a survey of the revision of Ceccato's thought and of the changes made to it, see also Marchetti (2006). What Operational Noology is; thought and language according to ON Operational Noology is an organic theory concerning the nature and the structure of thought.…”

“…During the 1990s two researchers coming from this School (Giorgio Marchetti, first, and then I) began and carried out, until 2003 in a completely independent way, a deep critical revision (Marchetti 1993(Marchetti , 1997(Marchetti , 2001(Marchetti , 2003Benedetti 1999Benedetti , 2004Benedetti , 2005a of Ceccato's thought and of his School (Glasersfeld 1989(Glasersfeld , 1998Parini 1996;Vaccarino 1988Vaccarino , 1997Vaccarino , 2000. From 2003 onward, there has been an intense exchange of ideas and opinions between the two researchers, who became acquainted with each other's work (Marchetti 2005a(Marchetti , b, 2006Benedetti 2005c).…”

“…I think that everyone of us can sense them rather well. Below, I quote a passage of an article of Marchetti (2003), written before he knew my work, which is a brief review of the operations of attention that are most commonly described in the literature of Cognitive Psychology:…”

The Semantics of Grammatical Elements: A New Solution

“…Talmy ([118], [119]) has investigated the role played by attention in meaning selection and construction by means of a specific research program (Linguistic Attention). This 6 A comparison with logical-formal and structuralist approaches can be found in [61], pp 191-192. program has been also maintained by Lampert ([120], [121], [122], [123]). …”

Studies on time: a proposal on how to get out of circularity

“…As I tried to show elsewhere (Marchetti 2001(Marchetti , 2003(Marchetti , 2005, the individuation of the operations responsible for the production of the meanings of words, thought and, more in general, of any kind of conscious experience, can be fruitfully carried out-using Dewey's pragmatist vocabulary (Dewey 1933)-in terms of means and ends. More specifically, it is possible to describe, adopting a firstperson perspective, the meanings of words, as well as any other kind of conscious experience, in terms of the end they have for the organism experiencing them, and to conceive of the operations responsible for their production as the physical means and processes developed and implemented in order to achieve the end.…”