A Preliminary Study: Validity and Reliability of Turkish Translation of Migraine Disability Assessment (Midas) Questionnaire in Turkish Patients With Chronic Tension Type Headache

Gedikoglu, Ümit; Üçler, Serap; İnan, Levent Ertuğrul; Coskun, Ozlem; Tunç, Tuğba

doi:10.1080/00207450500522444

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Proper correlations ( r > 0.5) were found between individual questions of MIDAS. We found a higher level of test-retest reliability among migraine patients rather than TTH patients, which points to a more stable condition among migraine patients because TTH per se is affected by multiple factors such as psychological items [19, 24]. …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Reliability and Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale among Migraine and Tension Type Headache in Iranian Patients

Zandifar

Asgari

Haghdoost

et al. 2014

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. MIDAS is a valid and reliable short questionnaire for assessment of headache related disability. Linguistic validation of Persian MIDAS and assessment of psychometric properties between tension type headache (TTH) and migraine were the aims of this study. Methods. Patients with migraine or TTH were included. At the first visit, we administered a headache symptom questionnaire, MIDAS, and SF-36. Patients filled out MIDAS in second and third visit within three and eight weeks after base line visit. Internal consistency (Cronbach α) and test-retest reproducibility (Spearman correlation coefficient) were used to assess reliability. Convergent validity and MIDAS capability to differentiate between chronic and episodic headaches (migraine and TTH) were also assessed. Results. The 267 participants had episodic migraine (EM-64%), chronic migraine (CM-13.5%), episodic TTH (ETTH-13.5%), and chronic TTH (CTTH-9). Internal consistency reliability was 0.8 for the entire sample, 0.72 for TTH, and 0.82 for migraine. Test-retest reliability for all questions between visit 1 and visit 2 varied from 0.54 to 0.71. Convergent validity was assessed using SF-36 as an external referent. Patients with episodic headaches (EM and ETTH) had significantly lower MIDAS scores than chronic headaches (CM and CTTH). Conclusion. Persian MIDAS is a valid and reliable questionnaire for migraine and TTH that can differentiate between episodic headache and chronic headache.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Reliability and Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale among Migraine and Tension Type Headache in Iranian Patients

Zandifar

Asgari

Haghdoost

et al. 2014

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although there is little variation in HRQoL between these headache groups, migraineurs report greater disability due to their headaches compared to TTH (19,(31)(32)(33)40), especially in work or school functioning (37). More missed days at school or work were reported by migraineurs, whereas reduced productivity at school or work was more prevalent among TTH patients (38,59,82,84). Solomon and colleagues (1994) used the SF health survey and found that CH patients had significantly worse pain scores with limited social functioning compared to the other groups, although physical functioning was preserved.…”

Section: Hrqol Across Headache Diagnosesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The most common types of CDH are chronic migraine (CM) and CTTH (5). Twenty-three studies were identified that evaluated HRQoL in CDH (12,36,45,51,52,72,76,77,78,(80)(81)(82)(83)(84)(85).…”

Section: Hrqol By Headache Diagnosesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of life in primary headache disorders: A review

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This narrative review suggests that headache, particularly in its chronic form, has a great impact on HRQoL. Clinical practice should not solely focus on pain alleviation but rather adopt routine assessment of HRQoL. Furthermore, identification and management of associated psychological comorbidities, which can significantly influence HRQoL in headache sufferers, are essential for optimal clinical management.

show abstract

“…18 The MIDAS questionnaire was originally developed to evaluate migraine, but studies show that it may also be used to evaluate other types of headaches. 19 The definition and classification of different types of headaches are extremely difficult as they do not have either definitive laboratory tests or objectively defining markers. 20 Studies show that there is also a significant overlap in the clinic and diagnostic criteria which makes it difficult to differentiate tension type headache from Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2012;32 (2) other headache disorders and, in particular, migraine.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Use of the MIDAS Questionnaire to Assess Migraine and Tension Type Headache in Adolescents

Kılıç¹,

Derman²,

Akgül³

et al. 2012

Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

466eadache is the most common type of pain that children and adolescents complain as well as being the most common neurological symptom.1 Epidemiologic studies have shown that 15-20% of all The Use of the MIDAS Questionnaire to Assess Migraine and Tension Type Headache in Adolescents A AB BS ST TR RA AC CT T O Ob bj je ec ct ti iv ve e: : Headache is the most common type of pain that children and adolescents complain as well as being the most common neurological symptom. Among all school-age children, 15-20% experience headache and 3-5% of these are migraine. To determine the grade of disability caused by migraine, a specific scale, the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire has been developed. Our objective was to gain information about the evaluation of different types of headaches in adolescents by using the Turkish version of the MIDAS, and to investigate its reliability for differentiation of migraine and tension type headaches. M Ma at te er ri ia al l a an nd d M Me et th ho od ds s: : Eighty two adolescents between the ages of 10 and 16 years were asked questions about the characteristics of their headaches and then the MIDAS questionnaire was administered. The type of headache was then determined according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders Criteria-II (ICHD-II). R Re es su ul lt ts s: : In 45 patients (54.9%) tension type, in 20 patients (24.4%) migraine, in 10 patients (12.2%) psychogenic type and in seven (8.5%) patients a mixed or non-specific headache was found. It was found that patients with tension type headaches were more likely to have a grade 1score (48.9%) whereas migraine type headache was more common in grade 4 (45%). C Co on nc cl lu us si io on n: : We believe that modification of the MIDAS questionnaire to meet the needs of adolescent patients will help in the differentiation between different types of headaches.K Ke ey y W Wo or rd ds s: : Migraine disorders; tension-type headache; adolescent Ö ÖZ ZE ET T A Am ma aç ç: : Baş ağrısı çocuk ve ergenlerde en sık görülen ağrı şikâyeti ve nörolojik semptomdur. Okul çağı çocukların %15-20'sinde baş ağrısı görülmektedir ve bunların %3-5'i migrendir. Migrene bağlı gelişen ağrının şiddet derecesini göstermek için MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment) ölçeği geliştirilmiştir. Çalışmanın amacı, MIDAS ölçeğinin Türkçe versiyonunun, adolesanlarda farklı baş ağrısı çeşitlerinin değerlendirilmesinde kullanılması, gerilim, migren ve diğer baş ağrısı tiplerinde ağrının şiddet derecesi konusunda bilgi sahibi olmak ve gerilim tipi ile migren tipi baş ağrılarının ayrımında kullanılabilirliğini değerlendirmektir. G Ge er re eç ç v ve e Y Yö ön nt te em ml le er r On-on altı yaşlar arasında 82 hastaya MIDAS ölçeği uygulandı ve baş ağrılarının özellikleri sorgulandı. Baş ağrısı sınıflaması Uluslararası Baş Ağrısı Sınıflama Kriterlerine göre yapıldı. B Bu ul lg gu ul la ar r: : Hastaların 45 (%54,9)'inde gerilim tipi, 20 (%24,4)'sinde migren tipi, 10 (%12,2)'unda psikojenik tip ve 7 (%8,5)'sinde miks tipi veya non spesi...

show abstract

A Preliminary Study: Validity and Reliability of Turkish Translation of Migraine Disability Assessment (Midas) Questionnaire in Turkish Patients With Chronic Tension Type Headache

Cited by 5 publications

References 8 publications

Reliability and Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale among Migraine and Tension Type Headache in Iranian Patients

Reliability and Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale among Migraine and Tension Type Headache in Iranian Patients

Quality of life in primary headache disorders: A review

The Use of the MIDAS Questionnaire to Assess Migraine and Tension Type Headache in Adolescents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About