2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.06.20031856
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A preliminary study on serological assay for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 238 admitted hospital patients

Abstract: 30Background The outbreak of the recently emerged novel corona virus disease 2019

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(31 reference statements)
3
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our kits have much higher accuracy than RT-qPCR (sensitivity less than 70%) for detecting viral RNA [9][10][11][12][13] , and published immune-assays such as " flow immunoassay" and ELISA in earlier studies 10-12, 17-21, 23, 24 . When we combined RBD-specific IgA and IgG kits together, the sensitivity, specificity and overall agreement elevate to 99• 1%, 100%, and 99• 7%, respectively (table 1).…”
Section: Our Serological Kits Have Overall Good Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our kits have much higher accuracy than RT-qPCR (sensitivity less than 70%) for detecting viral RNA [9][10][11][12][13] , and published immune-assays such as " flow immunoassay" and ELISA in earlier studies 10-12, 17-21, 23, 24 . When we combined RBD-specific IgA and IgG kits together, the sensitivity, specificity and overall agreement elevate to 99• 1%, 100%, and 99• 7%, respectively (table 1).…”
Section: Our Serological Kits Have Overall Good Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both challenges result in a sensitivity below 70%. [9][10][11][12][13] Therefore, there is an urgent need for more reliable and rapid diagnostic methods to screen SARS-CoV-2 infected people including those who do not have overt symptoms. A serological test of virus-induced antibody production has unique advantages in clinical diagnostics, especially for identifying people who acquired immunity against pathogens without noticeable symptoms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many serological enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) have been recently developed to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. However, these assays have four important limitations [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] . First, they lack the ability to detect antibodies at early stages of infection.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident that the infection may be effectively reduced and eventually controlled with swift and large-scale testing for early diagnostics [3][4][5][6] . Current testing methods include PCR nucleic acid detection with either thermal cycling 7,8 or isothermal amplification [9][10][11] , serological IgM/IgG antibody testing 12 as well as viral protein detections 13 in nasopharyngeal swap. The PCR based nucleic acid testing is very sensitive and accurate in early infection diagnostics but it generally requires multiple and lengthy processes including virus lysis, RNA extraction, reverse transcription and amplification and is prone to sample contamination 14,15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%