the researchers and discussants at the meeting in Orlando. JCEHP's editors determined which abstracts would appear in the supplement, selected the abstracts whose authors would be invited to submit full manuscripts, implemented a second round of peer review for manuscripts, worked with authors to revise and enhance their submission to meet JCEHP's standards and style, and made the final decision on which abstracts and manuscripts would be published.As TABLE 1 shows, 17 abstracts were submitted for the meeting and were peer reviewed. Of these, 14 were recommended for acceptance in the research track. For the supplement, authors were invited to submit either abstracts (n = 7) or full manuscripts (n = 7). Five of 6 manuscripts received were accepted following peer review. Seven abstracts were ultimately accepted for publication.This supplement does not simply re-present the 250-word abstracts that were accepted for the meeting. Instead, the reader will find longer versions (approximately 750 words for abstracts, 3000 words for articles), and these have benefited from the feedback the authors received from the audience following their presentations at the meeting, the additional round of peer review for articles, and close editing by JCEHP's staff. As noted on title pages, some contributions to this issue appear under different titles, and two appear in categories other than original research.The results of an analysis of the institutional affiliations of authors whose work appears in this issue are shown in TABLE 2. Of 35 authors, 18 were affiliated with universities, 7 with nonacademic accredited continuing medical education (CME) providers, 7 with for-profit consulting and service providers, 2 with the national boards, and 1 with government. Few had previously published in JCEHP.The articles and abstracts in this issue cover a broad range of research topics and include works that encompass theory building, program evaluation, economic impact, evaluation methodology, and strategic use of the research in CEHP.Williams and colleagues 2 report on a study examining the relationship of motivation and self-efficacy in relation to JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 34(S1):S1-S3, 2014
Olson