2003
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.74.3.279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Preliminary Report on the Tecoman, Mexico Earthquake of 22 January 2003 (Mw 7.4) and Its Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
2
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
29
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison made are important because in the first case Ramirez-Gaytán [23] generate PGA based in a previous model Ramirez-Gaytán [24] when using observed records to compare with synthetics. In the second case Singh [10] use real data, in both cases the results are very similar with the obtained in this study. All mentioned studies correspond at the same tectonic environment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison made are important because in the first case Ramirez-Gaytán [23] generate PGA based in a previous model Ramirez-Gaytán [24] when using observed records to compare with synthetics. In the second case Singh [10] use real data, in both cases the results are very similar with the obtained in this study. All mentioned studies correspond at the same tectonic environment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In third row comparison of simulated PGA of Tecoman earthquake from Ramirez-Gaytán [23] versus PGA predicted using the following GMPE: (e) Young's [17], (f) Ordaz [16]. In (e) comparison of real PGA of the Tecoman earthquake using records of stations with distances larger than 50 km versus GMPE of Ordaz [16] from Singh [10]. We made an additional comparison, for Tecoman earthquake Singh [10] used records of stations located at distances larger than 50 km and comparing the PGA versus Ordaz [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results presented here indicate that the 2003 Armería earthquake occurred on a continental intraplate reverse fault, in contrast to other works that favor faulting along the subduction interface between the Rivera and North American Plates (YAGI et al, 2004;SINGH et al, 2003). We suggest that the Armería shock and its aftershocks could represent partial accommodation of deformation in the continental crust caused by oblique subduction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…On 22 January 2003, a large earthquake with magnitude M w 7.6 occurred in front of the coast of the Mexican state of Colima, at the southeast end of the 9 October 1995, M w 8.0, Jalisco earthquake fault (Singh et al, 2003;Yagi et al, 2004) (Table 1). This earthquake occurred just in the area of the effective stress influence from the 1995 Jalisco earthquake, eight years after its occurrence, and also from the 1973 earthquake, almost 30 years after the event (Fig.…”
Section: Results From Statistical Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%