2012
DOI: 10.1177/1088357612450613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Social Skills Interventions for Youth With High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorders

Abstract: This study examined the effects of two social skills interventions, Sociodramatic Affective Relational Intervention (SDARI) and Skillstreaming, to compare their treatment mechanisms, social performance-and knowledge-training. A total of 13 youth with autism spectrum disorders were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of 1-day/week SDARI or Skillstreaming. Groups were matched on parent and child demographics, and intervention staff training. Participants were assessed on social behavior during treatment sessions, peer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
94
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
94
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the articles identified in this review evaluated program effectiveness using a pre-post design. However, researchers appear to be transitioning from these preliminary feasibility studies to more rigorously controlled trials, with several RCTs having been conducted and published in recent years (e.g., Laugeson et al 2012;Lerner & Mikami 2012;White et al 2013). With regard to treatment setting, most of the studies examined in this review took place in clinic settings, but a small number of studies suggest that social skills groups may be effective in school and community settings (e.g., Barnhill et al 2002;Kempe & Tissot 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the articles identified in this review evaluated program effectiveness using a pre-post design. However, researchers appear to be transitioning from these preliminary feasibility studies to more rigorously controlled trials, with several RCTs having been conducted and published in recent years (e.g., Laugeson et al 2012;Lerner & Mikami 2012;White et al 2013). With regard to treatment setting, most of the studies examined in this review took place in clinic settings, but a small number of studies suggest that social skills groups may be effective in school and community settings (e.g., Barnhill et al 2002;Kempe & Tissot 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study examining two different social skills group interventions found statistically significant results (based on unblinded interventionist ratings on the SSRSTeacher Survey) after 90 min of treatment every week for 4 weeks (Lerner & Mikami 2012). However, the researchers acknowledged the inherent limitations of such unblended measures and noted that the skill growth observed by the treatment providers was not reported by parents on the SSRS-Parent Survey, thus concluding that interventions of longer duration were likely necessary to produce generalized gains.…”
Section: Intervention Duration and Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The remaining 3 trials were assessed as having a high risk of bias factors, such as a small sample size and baseline differences between the intervention and control groups. One of these trials evaluated a training program for theory of mind (55), one compared two forms of skills training programs (56), and one studied the effect of a multimodal intervention for social skills and anxiety (57).…”
Section: Social Skills Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inability to understand the Perspective of Others results in social and communication problems and is often considered a primary deficit in ASD. Therefore, the improvement of social skills is often a focus of instruction for individuals with ASD [2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%