Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Minelike Targets IX 2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.541364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A preliminary investigation of the effects of soil electromagnetic properties on metal detectors

Abstract: Some soils can adversely affect the operation of sensitive metal detectors widely used to detect buried landmines. Although there has been some related work in geophysics, researchers in metal detection techniques, until very recently, seem to have largely ignored the issue of problem soil. As a result, rigorous scientific investigations of how soil electromagnetic properties may affect the operation of metal detectors are lacking. Thus, there is a need for theoretical and experimental studies to clarify which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is recognized that, in practice, the spatial inhomogeneity of soil electromagnetic properties may be the limiting factor in the performance of the metal detector, for this study the soil is modeled as a homogeneous half-space. Direct problem is solved basing on field representation described in [7]. The results of inversion procedure are depicted on fig.1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is recognized that, in practice, the spatial inhomogeneity of soil electromagnetic properties may be the limiting factor in the performance of the metal detector, for this study the soil is modeled as a homogeneous half-space. Direct problem is solved basing on field representation described in [7]. The results of inversion procedure are depicted on fig.1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Das (2004) has demonstrated, a useful approximation for the response over a nonconductive, dispersive magnetic soil is obtained by generalizing the previous result for a frequencydependent magnetic susceptibility. In particular, a well estab-1 In theory (equations (12) and (20)), the associated primary step response ν p (t) = −μ 0 πa 2 Iδ(t) ∞ 0 [J 1 (λa)] 2 dλ is similarly impulsive and infinite for coincident coils and independent of stand-off (h).…”
Section: Non-conductive Dispersive Magnetic Soilmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One of the other important factors that can influence this signal is the host soil. A systematic analytical framework, based on well-established techniques in geophysics and non-destructive testing, for studying the effects of soil electromagnetic properties was presented in a previous paper [7]. Numerical results included in that paper were limited and were used primarily to illustrate the response produced by a soil half-space with specific electromagnetic characteristics and to clearly explain some well-known previous experimental observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Numerical results included in that paper were limited and were used primarily to illustrate the response produced by a soil half-space with specific electromagnetic characteristics and to clearly explain some well-known previous experimental observations. In this paper, based on the formulation previously discussed in [7], the electromagnetic response of a buried small metallic sphere is analyzed and computed. The results are used to investigate the influence that electromagnetic parameters of the host soil have on the signal produced by a target and hence on its detectability by a metal detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%