2016
DOI: 10.1177/1541931213601161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Preliminary Investigation of the Effect of Protective Clothing Weight, Bulk and Stiffness on Combat Mobility Course Performance

Abstract: Soldier loads continue to rise in response to new technological capabilities and emerging threats. However, literature addressing the extent to which load mass properties affects operational task performance and mission outcome is sparse. The objective of this preliminary study was to quantify the effect of PPE mass properties (weight, bulk and stiffness) on combat mobility, as measured using the standardized Load Effects Assessment Program (LEAP) course. Twenty-four soldiers completed the LEAP course in three… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The military uses a functional task assessment, the Load Effects Assessment Program (LEAP), which includes evaluating decrements in sequential timed mobility tasks to quantify the performance differences due to soldier equipment (Bossi et al, 2016; Jones et al, 2014; Mitchell et al, 2016). Recent efforts examine LEAP performance using IMUs (Vitali et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The military uses a functional task assessment, the Load Effects Assessment Program (LEAP), which includes evaluating decrements in sequential timed mobility tasks to quantify the performance differences due to soldier equipment (Bossi et al, 2016; Jones et al, 2014; Mitchell et al, 2016). Recent efforts examine LEAP performance using IMUs (Vitali et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the thicknesses of 9.0 and 10.0 mm were not recommended to use for the further design activity of body armour via the FDM technique. Although these thicknesses provided higher stab resistance than the thickness of 8.0 mm, but the concern was to avoid more weight added to the designs of body armour [21,22]. Therefore, the 8.0 mm thickness was used as the minimum requirement in generating the designs of imbricate armour features.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic fit is important to assess in the context of occupation specific tasks, as the aim of the equipment item should be to minimize restrictions on mobility, and associated fatigue, metabolic cost, performance, and injury detriments. Commonly, dynamic fit is assessed through the use of ROM and functional task performance, including occupationally relevant tasks [13,18,[110][111][112] with standardised ROM tasks and procedures having been developed for some equipment items, such as body armour [15]. These tasks typically compare encumbered and non-encumbered conditions to establish a baseline for performance measures.…”
Section: Dynamic Fit Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%