Abstract:Objective-Little empirical attention has been paid to the DSM-5 definition of Binge Eating Disorder (BED), particularly to the associated features of binge episodes. The present study sought to determine how the associated features and undue influence of weight/shape on self-evaluation contribute to evidence of a clinically significant eating disorder.Method-Secondary analyses were conducted on data (N = 80; 76.3% women, 76.3% Caucasian, ages 18-43) collected through an epidemiological study of eating patterns… Show more
“…Therefore, individuals evaluated for BED are required to characterize “typical” binge‐eating episodes over the past three months, which may produce recall errors. Retrospective research suggests that the presence of DSM indicators predicts BED diagnostic status (White & Grilo, ), while other data suggest that the indicators have poor internal consistency and do not reliably predict eating‐related distress in community samples (Klein, Forney, & Keel, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrospective research suggests that the presence of DSM indicators predicts BED diagnostic status (White & Grilo, 2011), while other data suggest that the indicators have poor internal consistency and do not reliably predict eating-related distress in community samples (Klein, Forney, & Keel, 2016).…”
Objectives: Binge eating is common in adults with obesity. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Psychiatric Disorders describes five indicators of binge eating (eating more rapidly than usual; eating until uncomfortably full; eating large amounts of food when not physically hungry; eating alone because of embarrassment over how much one is eating; and feeling disgusted with oneself, depressed, or very guilty after overeating), but their validity is unclear.Method: We examined preliminary associations between the five indicators and binge versus nonbinge episodes among 50 adults with obesity via ecological momentary assessment.Results: Generalized linear models revealed that, relative to nonbinge episodes, self-reported binge episodes were associated with lower pre-episode hunger (p 5 .004), higher postepisode fullness (p < .001), a greater likelihood of reporting moderate to extreme shame prior to eating in conjunction with eating alone (p < .001), and a greater likelihood of reporting moderate to extreme disgust, depression, and/or guilt after eating (p < .001), but not with eating more rapidly than usual (p 5 .85).
Discussion:Results support the validity of most binge-eating indicators, although the utility of the rapid eating criterion is questionable. Future research should examine whether modifying these indicators in binge-eating interventions would reduce the occurrence of loss of control and/or overeating.
K E Y W O R D S
“…Therefore, individuals evaluated for BED are required to characterize “typical” binge‐eating episodes over the past three months, which may produce recall errors. Retrospective research suggests that the presence of DSM indicators predicts BED diagnostic status (White & Grilo, ), while other data suggest that the indicators have poor internal consistency and do not reliably predict eating‐related distress in community samples (Klein, Forney, & Keel, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrospective research suggests that the presence of DSM indicators predicts BED diagnostic status (White & Grilo, 2011), while other data suggest that the indicators have poor internal consistency and do not reliably predict eating-related distress in community samples (Klein, Forney, & Keel, 2016).…”
Objectives: Binge eating is common in adults with obesity. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Psychiatric Disorders describes five indicators of binge eating (eating more rapidly than usual; eating until uncomfortably full; eating large amounts of food when not physically hungry; eating alone because of embarrassment over how much one is eating; and feeling disgusted with oneself, depressed, or very guilty after overeating), but their validity is unclear.Method: We examined preliminary associations between the five indicators and binge versus nonbinge episodes among 50 adults with obesity via ecological momentary assessment.Results: Generalized linear models revealed that, relative to nonbinge episodes, self-reported binge episodes were associated with lower pre-episode hunger (p 5 .004), higher postepisode fullness (p < .001), a greater likelihood of reporting moderate to extreme shame prior to eating in conjunction with eating alone (p < .001), and a greater likelihood of reporting moderate to extreme disgust, depression, and/or guilt after eating (p < .001), but not with eating more rapidly than usual (p 5 .85).
Discussion:Results support the validity of most binge-eating indicators, although the utility of the rapid eating criterion is questionable. Future research should examine whether modifying these indicators in binge-eating interventions would reduce the occurrence of loss of control and/or overeating.
K E Y W O R D S
“…On the other hand, overvaluation has also been recently found not to predict distress related to binge eating in a community sample (Klein, Forney, & Keel, 2016). Concerning the role of obesity, adults with BED in the general population are around three times more likely than people without eating disorders to be mild to moderately obese and 6.5 times more likely to be severely obese (Kessler et al, 2013).…”
The findings support the inclusion of overvaluation as a diagnostic criterion or specifier in BED and the need to focus on body image disturbance in treatment and public health efforts in order to reduce the individual and community health burden of this condition.
“…The authors also tested both positive and negative predictive power to identify a Criterion B symptom threshold that maximized identification of binge-eating cases and minimized false positives, with results supporting the current threesymptom threshold for identifying binge eating in a BED/BN sample. Klein et al (2016) assessed how each Criterion B symptom was associated with distress in a majority-BED sample. Logistic regression revealed that "feeling disgusted/depressed/guilty" (B5) was the only Criterion B symptom that uniquely predicted distress about binge eating or associated weight gain.…”
Objective: The Criterion B binge-eating symptoms represent five symptoms associated with binge eating. Any three out of five symptoms can be used to meet Criterion B. However, Criterion B symptoms may not be interchangeable in terms of how binge-eating severity is associated with each symptom. Item response theory (IRT) can test how endorsing each symptom relates to the overall level (i.e., severity) of binge-eating measured by Criterion B. We used IRT to identify (a) how each Criterion B symptom corresponded with binge-eating severity in a transdiagnostic binge-eating sample and (b) how well each symptom differentiated individuals with differing levels of severity. Method: Participants (N = 219) were adults (80.8% female) with a current ED that included objective binge-eating episodes assessed via semi-structured interview. A two-parameter logistic IRT model evaluated how endorsement of each Criterion B symptom corresponded with the level of latent binge-eating severity. Results: "Eating large amounts when not hungry" and "eating alone" reflected the highest binge-eating severity. "Eating alone" was the best discriminator across different binge-eating severity levels, whereas "uncomfortably full" was the poorest discriminator across binge-eating severity levels. Discussion: Criterion B symptoms were not interchangeable in terms of what level of binge-eating severity corresponded with symptom endorsement. "Eating large amounts when not hungry" or "eating alone" may signify elevated binge-eating severity, whereas "uncomfortably full" and "feeling disgusted/depressed/guilty" were not necessarily indicative of elevated severity. Results suggested that Criterion B may need to be revised to eliminate symptoms that are redundant with other binge-eating diagnostic criteria.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.