2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A preliminary evaluation of the use of mid infrared spectroscopy to develop calibration equations for determining faecal composition, intake and digestibility in sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CrV between 0.66 and 0.81 indicating a lower accuracy that allows an approximate quantitative prediction. A similar accuracy in ash estimation from faeces was reported in literature both of dairy cattle (Decruyenaere et al 2012) and in sheep (Lyons et al 2016). On the other hand, calibrations for N-NDF, N-ADF, ADLom, EN and uNDF led to unsatisfactory results.…”
Section: Chemical and Nirs Evaluation Of Faecessupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CrV between 0.66 and 0.81 indicating a lower accuracy that allows an approximate quantitative prediction. A similar accuracy in ash estimation from faeces was reported in literature both of dairy cattle (Decruyenaere et al 2012) and in sheep (Lyons et al 2016). On the other hand, calibrations for N-NDF, N-ADF, ADLom, EN and uNDF led to unsatisfactory results.…”
Section: Chemical and Nirs Evaluation Of Faecessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…NIRS is extensively used to analyse the composition of diets, feedstuffs, forages (Rahman et al 2015), pet food (Goi et al 2019;Goi, Manuelian, et al 2020;Goi, Simoni, et al 2020), meat (De Marchi et al 2007De Marchi 2013;Prieto et al 2017), milk and dairy products (Visentin et al 2015) in terms of DM, OM, EE, CP, starch, NDF, ADF, ADL and ash in the different cases. It was also applied on faecal samples with promising prediction of feed intake, diet quality and digestibility in different livestock species (Dixon and Coates 2009;Tran et al 2010;Decruyenaere et al 2012;Tolleson and Schafer 2014;Lyons et al 2016;N uñez-S anchez et al 2016;Johnson et al 2017;Brogna et al 2018). The NIRS digestibility prediction of DM, OM, CP, NDF, ADF, ADL and starch in faeces obtained using the total collection procedure as a reference method showed encouraging results on beef heifers and steers (Boval et al 2004;Jancewicz et al 2016;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of lignin in animal feeds and forages is important, as higher lignin content is generally associated with lower digestibility, leading to lower voluntary intakes , and reduced animal performance levels. Historically, lignin has been determined by gravimetric or spectrophotometric methods, both of which are time-consuming and costly, requiring lengthy wet chemical sample preparation techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in the H. contortus egg spectra resembling the spectra of typical animal faeces previously published. 30,31 Therefore, spectra associated with faeces were manually subtracted from the dried H. contortus egg data. Due to the difference in moisture content, absorbance for dried H. contortus eggs was higher than that observed for dried clean faeces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%