2014
DOI: 10.1111/fme.12076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A preliminary evaluation of the European Non‐native Species in Aquaculture Risk Assessment Scheme applied to species listed on Annex IV of the EU Alien Species Regulation

Abstract: Developed for carrying out risk assessments under the European

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on enclosures in a shallow temporary marsh in the Camargue (southern France), a negative relationship was found between C. carpio biomass and amount of aquatic vegetation left at the end of the experiment, but without effects on turbidity (Crivelli 1983). Also in that study, aquatic macrophyte loss was attributed to mechanical damage, similar to previous findings from North America.…”
Section: Enclosures Within a Water Bodysupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on enclosures in a shallow temporary marsh in the Camargue (southern France), a negative relationship was found between C. carpio biomass and amount of aquatic vegetation left at the end of the experiment, but without effects on turbidity (Crivelli 1983). Also in that study, aquatic macrophyte loss was attributed to mechanical damage, similar to previous findings from North America.…”
Section: Enclosures Within a Water Bodysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, in some areas where it has naturalised (e.g. Western Europe and Thrace/Anatolia in Turkey), the species status is being re-assessed due to increasing awareness of the potential risks posed to the native biota (Almeida et al, 2013;Tarkan et al, 2014;Copp et al, 2015), despite the species being highly prized for sports fish (e.g. Arlinghaus and Mehner 2003;Hickley and Chare 2004;Rapp et al 2008), representing a valuable and productive fishery (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), there is an ongoing requirement for risk assessments to be based on empirical data (Copp et al . ). Dietary interactions with resident species frequently determine the outcome of introductions of non‐native species (Baiser, Russell & Lockwood ; Jackson et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For piscivorous fishes, impacts tend to be via predation with, for example, invasive largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides and peacock basses of the Cichla genus having deleterious impacts on native species richness and fish abundance (Gratwicke & Marshall, 2001;Pelicice & Agostinho, 2009). Managing the impact of invasive fishes in open systems is challenging (Britton, Gozlan, & Copp, 2011), so predictions that indicate whether an introduced species will develop an invasion are fundamental to their management (Copp et al, 2014(Copp et al, , 2016. Spatial assessments of somatic growth rates assist these predictions (Britton, Harper, & Oyugi, 2010), especially as growth rates can be a strong proxy of other life-history traits (Oyugi et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been much less focus on their spatial variability in growth parameters (Milardi, Lappalainen, Malinen, Vinni, & Ruuhijärvi, 2011;Pérez-Bote & Roso, 2012), and how their age range and somatic growth rates might vary across their native and invasive distributions. This is despite the ecological and management utility of these data for assisting invasion risk assessments across their invasive range (Copp et al, 2014(Copp et al, , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%