2018
DOI: 10.1080/00295450.2018.1424431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Preliminary Economic Assessment of Thorium-Based Fuels in a Pressure Tube Heavy Water Reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work by Colton et al [172,173] identified a slightly enriched uranium fuel concept augmented by small amounts of thorium for use in generic pressure tube heavy-water reactors (PT-HWRs) [174]. This concept and others [175,176], may have fuel costs lower than natural uranium fuel. Future work can build on these results by providing more comprehensive estimated life cycle costs and consider a comparison to additional fuel concepts, which can also meet operational safety needs [177][178][179][180][181].…”
Section: Developing More Economical Thorium-based Fuel Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent work by Colton et al [172,173] identified a slightly enriched uranium fuel concept augmented by small amounts of thorium for use in generic pressure tube heavy-water reactors (PT-HWRs) [174]. This concept and others [175,176], may have fuel costs lower than natural uranium fuel. Future work can build on these results by providing more comprehensive estimated life cycle costs and consider a comparison to additional fuel concepts, which can also meet operational safety needs [177][178][179][180][181].…”
Section: Developing More Economical Thorium-based Fuel Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the case of Ontario, Canada, nuclear power generation remains more economical than, for instance, gas and wind by approximately 51% and 49%, respectively [214]. In addition, a recent preliminary study suggests a recycling fuel cycle could be still leave nuclear power generation potentially more economic than fossil fuel and renewables [176], which could be important to nations with limited uranium resources and polices aimed at diversifying their fuel types and sources. The competitive advantage of nuclear power generation has not impeded companies such as Bruce Power (in Ontario) from seeking alternatives revenue streams, such as producing isotopes [215].…”
Section: Potential Ways To Overcome the Re-fabrication And Reprocessimentioning
confidence: 99%