1966
DOI: 10.1007/bf00161494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A preliminary biological study of the effects of pollution on Farmer's Creek and Cox's River, New South Wales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were marked differences between the site receiving sewage effluent and the reference sites in taxonomic richness (ANOVA), ordination groupings (NMDS) and pairwise comparisons of community composition (ANOSIM). Similar differences between reference and polluted sites have been reported in several other Australian studies of the effects of organic wastes on stream macroinvertebrate communities (Jolly & Chapman 1966;Campbell 1978;Arthington et al 1982;Pearson & Penridge 1987;Cosser 1988). In particular, an increased abundance of dipterans, especially Chironomidae, and a scarcity of Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera, are characteristic of Australian streams polluted by organic wastes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…There were marked differences between the site receiving sewage effluent and the reference sites in taxonomic richness (ANOVA), ordination groupings (NMDS) and pairwise comparisons of community composition (ANOSIM). Similar differences between reference and polluted sites have been reported in several other Australian studies of the effects of organic wastes on stream macroinvertebrate communities (Jolly & Chapman 1966;Campbell 1978;Arthington et al 1982;Pearson & Penridge 1987;Cosser 1988). In particular, an increased abundance of dipterans, especially Chironomidae, and a scarcity of Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera, are characteristic of Australian streams polluted by organic wastes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Assessment of the impacts of urbanisation on rivers and streams has involved the research and use of a wide range of physical, chemical and biological indicators (Jolly and Chapman 1966;Suren 2000;Paul and Meyer 2001;Center for Watershed Protection 2003). Freshwater biota (e.g., microbes, algae, macrophytes, invertebrates, fish) has been used to describe the changes of urbanisation (e.g., Paul and Meyer 2001), with freshwater macroinvertebrates being broadly regarded as particularly sensitive and robust indicators of the health of urban waterway ecosystems (Jolly and Chapman 1966;Gresens et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freshwater biota (e.g., microbes, algae, macrophytes, invertebrates, fish) has been used to describe the changes of urbanisation (e.g., Paul and Meyer 2001), with freshwater macroinvertebrates being broadly regarded as particularly sensitive and robust indicators of the health of urban waterway ecosystems (Jolly and Chapman 1966;Gresens et al 2007). However, sampling methods for freshwater invertebrates are diverse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of these goals provides a great stimulus for the inclusion of biological indicators in routine programmes of water quality assessment and monitoring, something that aquatic biologists in this country have been advocating for nearly three decades (Jolly & Chapman 1966;Mclvor 1976;Williams 1980a;Campbell 1982). However, the wording of these goals raises some practical issues for biologists involved in such programmes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%