Recreational
HILMI IBRAHIMZeigler's device, "How preference and i . personal1 t y I I d o y o u rrite yourself recreationally," was used to classify 103 inale and 104 female students into four categories: recreationally outstanding, above average, average, and below average. California Psychological Inventory (CPI) w m administered to all subjects. Analyses of variance were conducted to find out if significant differences existed among the four groups of men and the four groups of women. The two groups were reclassified ciccorditi'q to t y p e of activity or cluster of activities preferred: physical, social, communicative, aesthetic, and learnings; and another set of analyses of vciricince.~ wus conducted among these new groups. Alrhough the F tests revederl that there were significant differences in some, but not all, of the traits of personnlity among the groups, it was concluded that the eviclenc,e is not .strong enough to indicate that there are differences between the personulities of those who are recreationally inclined and ihose who are nor recretrtionally inclined. Also, it was concluded that there was not enough .stciti.stical evidence to support the notion that the personalities of those who ure inclined toward sport, socinl activities, communication, aesthetics, or hobbies would vary significantly.