2009
DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v4s1.794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Preliminary Analysis of Software Engineering Metrics-based Criteria for the Evaluation of Learning Objects Reusability

Abstract: Abstract-Reusability of learning objects is evaluated on the basis of a priori software reusability analysis, which are related to cohesion and coupling aspects. A number of reusability metrics extracted from metadata records are defined and analyzed to provide an aggregate reusability evaluation for learning objects in a repository. The evaluation is validated and compared with an expert-based a posteriori evaluation method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A digital resource by itself may lack some of the features that facilitate its access, use and reuse. Therefore, a digital resource could be considered a learning object if it contains at least some of the following characteristics: educational and instructional design in its creation (Wiley, 2002); pedagogical components (Polsani, 2006); and metadata information achieving some degree of interoperability, accessibility and reusability between different systems (Friesen, 2009; Sanz et al , 2009). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A digital resource by itself may lack some of the features that facilitate its access, use and reuse. Therefore, a digital resource could be considered a learning object if it contains at least some of the following characteristics: educational and instructional design in its creation (Wiley, 2002); pedagogical components (Polsani, 2006); and metadata information achieving some degree of interoperability, accessibility and reusability between different systems (Friesen, 2009; Sanz et al , 2009). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…metadata information achieving some degree of interoperability, accessibility and reusability between different systems (Friesen, 2009; Sanz et al , 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation criteria for selection of visualization library. its creation [42]; ii) educational components for its use [43]; iii) a set of descriptions called metadata which help to achieve some degree of interoperability, accessibility and reusability between different systems [44,45].…”
Section: Analysis Of Search Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Background Some studies focus on evaluating aspects, or on metrics for determining the quality level of the learning object, for example, the levels of reusability, accessibility, usability and portability, among others. Sanz et al (2009) proposed to evaluate the reusability from a structural viewpoint, through the following features: self-contained, modular, properly grained, traceable, modifiable, usable and standardized. From a contextual viewpoint, a learning object which is more dependent and specific will be more limited in terms of its reusability.…”
Section: El 355 954mentioning
confidence: 99%