(Text-figs. 1-5) 153 It is now more than 40 years since Esterly (1917) first demonstrated on Acartia that the diurnal vertical migration of plankton might be governed by an endogenous rhythm of activity, irrespective of external stimuli except for those due to gravity. Since that time, however, evidence has accumulated of the dominant effect of light on~planktonic movement and the attention of nearly all recent workers has been concentrated on this as the main source of migration.Observations in the field (Russell, 1927;Clarke, 1933) and in the laboratory (Harris & Wolfe, 1955) have demonstrated a clear correlation of the downward movement of many species in the morning with an increase of overhead illumination, and of the reverse upward movement at dusk with a corresponding decrease in surface illumination. Bogorov (1946) has reported measurements from polar seas which suggest that the vertical migration of several planktonic species, present in its characteristic form during the autumn when there is a typical diurnal rhythm of light intensity, is absent during the arctic summer, when there is little or no change in surface illumination through the 24 h. No corresponding observations have been reported during winter months in polar seas.Bogorov points out that the species studied during the arctic summer live at a characteristic depth, and must therefore be actively maintaining this depth against upwelling and downward currents which would tend to displace them. He therefore concludes, with earlier workers, that the organisms are maintaining themselves at a level with optimum light conditions. This notion of an' optimum' light intensity, first developed by Rose (1925) and very actively explored by Russell (1927) is not inconsistent with laboratory observations made much earlier by Ewald (1910) on Cladocera. An alternation of active upward swimming and active or passive downward movement determines upper and lower boundaries of distribution governed by light intensity; the notion of an optimum light intensity, albeit subject to adaptation, is clearly envisaged by Ewald.Harris & Wolfe (1955), by recording photographically the movements of a population in a tank of water filled with a dilute solution of Indian ink,