29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1991
DOI: 10.2514/6.1991-58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A predictor-corrector guidance algorithm for use in high-energy aerobraking system studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(7) with Eq. (9). When the vehicle flies in the down phase, the factors K ρ and K LD are fixed during the trajectory prediction.…”
Section: Trajectory Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(7) with Eq. (9). When the vehicle flies in the down phase, the factors K ρ and K LD are fixed during the trajectory prediction.…”
Section: Trajectory Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,12]. Generally, the desired bank magnitude profile is obtained through an iteration technique, such as Newton-Raphson method [9,13], bisection method [10], secant method [7,14], and false position method [5,15]. It is remarked that improper lateral state in the first entry will result in a stressful crossrange or crossrange rate for the second entry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bank angle modulation has been employed in all five of these schemes, which have been demonstrated on simulated AFE flights. Braun and Powell 13 have developed a three-phase, three-degree-of-freedom, predictorcorrector, guidance algorithm. The first phase uses a constant commanded bank angle calculated to yield the proper exit energy.…”
Section: Robust Roll Modulation Guidance For Aeroassisted Mars Missionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, these types of guidance algorithms have long been analyzed and simulated in various entry vehicles [7][8][9][10] and aero-assisted orbital transfer missions [11,12] for their feasibility and robustness. A standard PC algorithm uses numerical or analytical methods to integrate the translational equations of motion for the prediction of the final conditions and then a correctional step follows to nullify the final errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%