2013
DOI: 10.1007/jhep07(2013)139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A predictive Yukawa unified SO(10) model: Higgs and sparticle masses

Abstract: We revisit a class of supersymmetric SO(10) models with t-b-τ Yukawa coupling unification condition, with emphasis on the prediction of the Higgs mass. We discuss qualitative features in this model that lead to a Higgs mass prediction close to 125 GeV. We show this with two distinct computing packages, Isajet and SuSpect, and also show that they yield similar global features in the parameter space of this model. We find that t-b-τ Yukawa coupling unification prefers values of the CP-odd Higgs mass m A to be ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these approaches, numerous mainstream unification candidates (and variations of them) exist, including, superstring theory [6], QG, loop quantum gravity (LQG) [7][8][9][10][11], Chern-Simons theory [12], Yukawa (10) theory [13], E8 theory [14], and others. Frequently, components and ideas from different theories are combined, adjusted, and "hacked" together (i.e., copy-andpaste methods) to establish new hybrid theoretical frameworks with customized capabilities, such as semiclassical physics, which intertwines aspects of quantum mechanics and classical mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among these approaches, numerous mainstream unification candidates (and variations of them) exist, including, superstring theory [6], QG, loop quantum gravity (LQG) [7][8][9][10][11], Chern-Simons theory [12], Yukawa (10) theory [13], E8 theory [14], and others. Frequently, components and ideas from different theories are combined, adjusted, and "hacked" together (i.e., copy-andpaste methods) to establish new hybrid theoretical frameworks with customized capabilities, such as semiclassical physics, which intertwines aspects of quantum mechanics and classical mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, none of these candidates are accepted to be complete by mainstream science. For example, some frameworks like superstring theory [6], 2 Advances in High Energy Physics Yukawa (10) theory [13], and E8 theory [14] are incomplete because they require more spatial degrees of freedom to operate than 4D space-time can offer so they cannot be tested in the laboratory, while other theories are incomplete because they fail to fully describe paradoxical phenomena like BHs, which remain imposing and elusive and continue to violate the modern laws of physics. Hence, the theories must be subjected to additional stringent scientific research, scrutiny, debate, and experimentation so they can continue to evolve and achieve improved representational capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this scenario the desired supersymmetric threshold corrections to t-b-τ Yukawa couplings can be realized with Mg mb [12][13][14][15][16][17]. For a particular choice of SSB gaugino masses (M 1 : M 2 : M 3 = 1 : 3 : −2) at M GUT , which can be derived in the framework of SO(10) GUT, it was shown [18,19] that the CP-even SM-like Higgs boson mass m h ≈ 125 GeV can be predicted from t-b-τ YU. This result does not change much in terms of the Higgs mass prediction if we relax t-b-τ YU up to 10% [18,19].…”
Section: Jhep05(2014)079mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, imposing t-b-τ Yukawa coupling unification condition at M GUT [6][7][8] can place significant constraints on the supersymmetric spectrum in order to fit the top, bottom and tau masses. These constraints are quite severe [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], especially after the discovery of a SM like Higgs boson with mass, m h 125 − 126 GeV [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%