2018
DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2018.090148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Predictive Model for Solar Photovoltaic Power using the Levenberg-Marquardt and Bayesian Regularization Algorithms and Real-Time Weather Data

Abstract: Abstract-The stability of power production in photovoltaics (PV) power plants is an important issue for large-scale gridconnected systems. This is because it affects the control and operation of the electrical grid. An efficient forecasting model is proposed in this paper to predict the next-day solar photovoltaic power using the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) and Bayesian Regularization (BR) algorithms and real-time weather data. The correlations between the global solar irradiance, temperature, solar photovoltaic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the former leads to more accurate predictions with RMSE equals to 19.24 kW, MAE equals to 10.84 kW, and R 2 equals to 91.59% compared to the values of the latter with RMSE equals to 23.68 kW, MAE equals to 16.44 kW, and R 2 equals to 85.28%, when the BR learning algorithm being used. In addition, the BR shows the best in Alomari et al (2018b) when looking at the predictions accuracy without any consideration of the computational efforts required for building/developing/optimizing the ANN prediction models, whereas in this work, the computational efforts are considered and showed that a compromise between the predictions accuracy FIGURE 7 | Average performance metrics obtained by the ANN models on the test dataset over the 5-CV using the D t 8 set of features compared to the two P Benchmarks. and the computational efforts has to be taken into account.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, the former leads to more accurate predictions with RMSE equals to 19.24 kW, MAE equals to 10.84 kW, and R 2 equals to 91.59% compared to the values of the latter with RMSE equals to 23.68 kW, MAE equals to 16.44 kW, and R 2 equals to 85.28%, when the BR learning algorithm being used. In addition, the BR shows the best in Alomari et al (2018b) when looking at the predictions accuracy without any consideration of the computational efforts required for building/developing/optimizing the ANN prediction models, whereas in this work, the computational efforts are considered and showed that a compromise between the predictions accuracy FIGURE 7 | Average performance metrics obtained by the ANN models on the test dataset over the 5-CV using the D t 8 set of features compared to the two P Benchmarks. and the computational efforts has to be taken into account.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Results showed that the ANN characterized by one hidden layer, LinearSigmoidAxon as a neuron activation function, and Conjugate Gradient as a learning algorithm is capable of providing accurate solar power predictions. Alomari et al (2018b) proposed a prediction model for solar PV power production based on ANN. The proposed model explored the capabilities of two learning algorithms, namely Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) and Bayesian Regularizations (BR), using different combinations of the time stamp and the realtime weather features (i.e., ambient temperature and global solar radiation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In single layer architecture, we used the tansig transfer function in the hidden layer and the purelin transfer function in the output layer. Alomari et al (2018) and Quintana et al (2011) say that this network can ballpark any function with a limited number of discontinuities if the appropriate number of neurons are provided.…”
Section: Figure 6 Different Transfer Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%