1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00366912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A predictive model for impact response of viscoelastic polymers in drop tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the drop-weight impact case, required data provided by Larson et al 10 are used as a case study for examining our theoretical formulation. A mass of 1.81 kg was dropped from a height of 42 cm on a cylindrical material of 2.49 cm diameter and 2.54 cm thickness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the drop-weight impact case, required data provided by Larson et al 10 are used as a case study for examining our theoretical formulation. A mass of 1.81 kg was dropped from a height of 42 cm on a cylindrical material of 2.49 cm diameter and 2.54 cm thickness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, they found that the optimum viscoelastic material property of impact absorber depends on the shape of the impactor. Larson et al 10 developed a viscoelastic mathematical model that can predict the impact force and deflection of rubbery material with the help of the classical linear Hookean viscoelastic constitutive law. They performed the drop-weight test with a commercial drop tester to validate the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A more advance spring constant model is now investigated and results will be reported in a future publication. The skin biosimulant coupled with the soft tissue is more complex still, and its behavior is currently being investigated through finite element analysis, and relevant literature studies (Larson, et al, 1996) (Salisbury and Cronin, 2009). …”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. This allows silly putty to bounce elastically since its τ term ∼ 0.1 s is longer than the typical timescales that correspond to impact, τ obs ∼ 0.1-10 ms. 63,64 The distinction between long and short timescales has important practical consequences for designing materials with desired properties for specific applications. Typically, τ obs is determined by the application of interest, and the goal is to control τ term to elicit the appropriate viscoelastic behavior.…”
Section: Box 4 Long and Short Timescalesmentioning
confidence: 99%