2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2006.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A predictive model (ETLM) for As(III) adsorption and surface speciation on oxides consistent with spectroscopic data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
88
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
13
88
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4a, b). Although previous studies showed that As(V) always had stronger affinity than As(III) to adsorb on Fe oxides (Tufano et al 2008;Sverjensky and Fukushi 2006), our results suggested that the released As(V) could not be further adsorbed on hematite (Fig. 4a).…”
Section: Oxidation Of As(iii) In Mn(ii)-hematite Suspensioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…4a, b). Although previous studies showed that As(V) always had stronger affinity than As(III) to adsorb on Fe oxides (Tufano et al 2008;Sverjensky and Fukushi 2006), our results suggested that the released As(V) could not be further adsorbed on hematite (Fig. 4a).…”
Section: Oxidation Of As(iii) In Mn(ii)-hematite Suspensioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…5). The monodentate binding is different from the bidentate binding common to Fe and Al oxides [26]. One zirconyl cation can thereby accommodate up to two arsenate anions at hydroxyl edges, which readily explains its high As sorption capacity [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sample characteristics and surface protonation and electrolyte adsorption equilibrium constants used in the present study are summarized in Table 1. Although HFO and ferrihydrite might be thought to have extremely similar surface chemical properties, we distinguished between them in our previous study of As(III) adsorption (Sverjensky and Fukushi, 2006b). By using differences in the pH ZPC (i.e.…”
Section: Aqueous Speciation Surface Protonation and Electrolyte Adsomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6)-(9) using the tabulated values of N S , A S , pH ZPC and DpK h n . a Values generated by regression of arsenate adsorption as a function of surface coverage, with the following exceptions: values for HFO, ferrihydrite, b-Al(OH) 3 , FeOOH (Dixit and Hering, 2003) and amAEAlO were taken from previous regression calculations of arsenite adsorption data on the same samples (Sverjensky and Fukushi, 2006b); the value for the Manning and Goldberg goethite was generated with the equation for the line in Fig. 6 based on arsenite and sulfate regressions (Fukushi and Sverjensky, 2006).…”
Section: Aqueous Speciation Surface Protonation and Electrolyte Adsomentioning
confidence: 99%