2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1389-1286(01)00304-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A predictability analysis of network traffic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
91
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Best mean square error linear predictor: This is the predictor in 1, which provides a minimum on the square error and has been adopted in other papers [3], [5], [4]. While this is the best linear predictor we note that non-linear predictors, for instance wavelet-based [3], which are tailored to the specific case of long-range dependent processes, can provide further improvements in prediction error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Best mean square error linear predictor: This is the predictor in 1, which provides a minimum on the square error and has been adopted in other papers [3], [5], [4]. While this is the best linear predictor we note that non-linear predictors, for instance wavelet-based [3], which are tailored to the specific case of long-range dependent processes, can provide further improvements in prediction error.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For video and network data traffic, linear prediction methods have been considered in the literature as a simple and effective alternative [3], [4], [5]. Let Ò · ½ ´´Ò · ½ µ µ ´Ò µ ´Ø · µ ´Øµ, Ò ¼ ½ AE ½ with Ø Ò .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the authors concluded that predictions are dependent on the timescale -sub-second prediction performing consistently worse -and on the specific type of the network trace. The work presented in [26] analyzes the predictability of network traffic bit rates using AutoRegressive Moving Average (ARMA) and Markov-Modulated Poisson Process (MMPP) models. Under the assumption that those models are appropriate, authors of [26] developed analytic expressions to describe bounded predictability.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work presented in [26] analyzes the predictability of network traffic bit rates using AutoRegressive Moving Average (ARMA) and Markov-Modulated Poisson Process (MMPP) models. Under the assumption that those models are appropriate, authors of [26] developed analytic expressions to describe bounded predictability. Traffic aggregation and smoothing proved to monotonically increase the predictability of the network traffic.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used a linear prediction model that is solved through WienerHopf equations. Sang and Li [15] assessed the predictability of traffic by considering how far into the future a traffic rate process can be predicted with bounded error and what the minimum prediction error is over a specified prediction time interval. They used two models, namely the auto-regressive moving average and the Markov-modulated Poisson process and concluded that the applicability of traffic prediction is limited by the deteriorating prediction accuracy with increasing prediction interval.…”
Section: Traffic Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%