Abstract:A cultural economic perspective focuses on values as they affect behavior, the valuations in various spheres as well as the valorization, that is, the enhancement or the changing of values. The pragmatic view focuses on the way values function in everyday life and in particular on the deliberations in which they are formed and expressed. Values matter; the challenge is to render them susceptible to analysis in economic contexts. The illustrations are derived from the economics of the arts.Values, Economic, Soc… Show more
“…Depending on context, the term culture can have a number of meanings, including the arts, good manners and habits, artefacts, shared knowledge, symbols and discourse as well as civilisation generally. 5 Here, we follow the conception of culture as a set of values and attitudes shared by a particular group, acquired through the process of socialisation (Berry, Poortinga, Segall, & Dasen, 2002;Grunert & Juhl, 1995;Klamer, 2003;Smith & Schwartz, 1997). In turn, attitudes are commonly defined as learned predispositions to react to stimuli (objects and events) in consistent ways (DeFleur & Westie, 1963;Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975;Gross & Niman, 1975;Kiecolt, 1988;Schuman & Johnson, 1976).…”
“…Depending on context, the term culture can have a number of meanings, including the arts, good manners and habits, artefacts, shared knowledge, symbols and discourse as well as civilisation generally. 5 Here, we follow the conception of culture as a set of values and attitudes shared by a particular group, acquired through the process of socialisation (Berry, Poortinga, Segall, & Dasen, 2002;Grunert & Juhl, 1995;Klamer, 2003;Smith & Schwartz, 1997). In turn, attitudes are commonly defined as learned predispositions to react to stimuli (objects and events) in consistent ways (DeFleur & Westie, 1963;Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975;Gross & Niman, 1975;Kiecolt, 1988;Schuman & Johnson, 1976).…”
“…Indeed, Holbrook (1994Holbrook ( , 1999 has emphasized that value-related terms are used in ways (psycholinguistic performance) that may depart dramatically from their philosophical conceptualization (linguistic competence). In this connection, confusion between ''value'' (singular) and ''values'' (plural) occurs too often, though authors such as Klamer (2003) and Stuhr (2003) have addressed this topic, shedding light on the differences between such terms as ''values,'' ''valuations,'' and ''valorization.'' For example, another potential source of misunderstanding comes from the discrepant meanings of the word ''value'' in two marketingrelated domains -consumer behavior and marketing strategy (Lai, 1995).…”
Grounded on fundamental marketing principles, the concept of customer value has been revisited and refined by academicians and practitioners for the last 30 years. However, research devoted to achieving a consistent theoretical and conceptual development of valuerelated concepts has proceeded apace without ever reaching full closure. The present essay seeks reasons behind remaining deficiencies in value-related research and offers a review intended to move our understanding of customer value toward what promises to become a more enlightened future. The topic of value is approached by theoretical analysis and conceptual development. First, ''the challenge'' of value research is presented: the researcher faces a topic that is central to the marketing discipline but that suffers from various conceptual and methodological difficulties. Second, among the literature on value from the last three decades, two main research areas are selected: the conceptual delimitation and the methodological links between quality, satisfaction, and value. Third, as a conclusion, we identify several streams of research that promise to expand future knowledge in the area of customer value. Several tables and figures that provide a systematic and structured review of value-related knowledge support this inventory of the state-of-the-art in value research. Even the most patient theoretical development of value-related concepts tends to resist full conceptual closure. The breadth of customer value and its richness for marketing implications encourage novel and refreshing approaches.
“…Yet conventional economic approaches to valuation, including the valuation of non-market benefits of the environment, and the welfare economic theory on which these are based, tend to approach value as one-dimensional, and (ultimately) held by individuals alone. Value to society is thus typically considered through aggregation of individual valuations, with the assumption that these valuations reflect underlying preferences and values (Klamer, 2003). However, such an approach may not capture collective meanings and significance ascribed to natural environments, potentially missing important, shared dimensions of value.…”
Social valuation of ecosystem services and public policy alternatives is one of the greatest challenges facing ecological economists today. Frameworks for valuing nature increasingly include shared/social values as a distinct category of values. However, the nature of shared/social values, as well as their relationship to other values, has not yet been clearly established and empirical evidence about the importance of shared/social values for valuation of ecosystem services is lacking. To help address these theoretical and empirical limitations, this paper outlines a framework of shared/social values across five dimensions: value concept, provider, intention, scale, and elicitation process. Along these dimensions we identify seven main, non-mutually exclusive types of shared values: transcendental, cultural/societal, communal, group, deliberated and other-regarding values, and value to society. Using a case study of a recent controversial policy on forest ownership in England, we conceptualise the dynamic interplay between shared/social and individual values. The way in which social value is assessed in neoclassical economics is discussed and critiqued, followed by consideration of the relation between shared/social values and Total Economic Value, and a review of deliberative and non-monetary methods for assessing shared/social values. We conclude with a discussion of the importance of shared/social values for decision-making
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.