2018
DOI: 10.5539/hes.v8n2p81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pragmatic Study of Relational Identity in Bystander Intervention

Abstract: Given that intervention has been relatively under-researched in pragmatics, this paper offers a linguistic-pragmatic examination of a case of bystander intervention, a notion which is generally known in social psychology. This study approaches the phenomenon of bystander intervention by analyzing discourse data transcribed from a video posted online. Drawing on participation status and relational identity theory, this paper investigates the issues of relational identity and relationships involved in an interve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The woman shunned this suggestion and shifted the interactional focus into a ratification of the elderly man’s participation status by asking, ‘Who are you?’. This question was utilized not to obtain an answer about the man’s identity, but to challenge his participation status (Huang, 2018), as corroborated by the subsequent interaction (‘You mind my business?’). In other words, the elderly man’s deontic authority to intervene was resisted by the young woman (Stevanovic and Peräkylä, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The woman shunned this suggestion and shifted the interactional focus into a ratification of the elderly man’s participation status by asking, ‘Who are you?’. This question was utilized not to obtain an answer about the man’s identity, but to challenge his participation status (Huang, 2018), as corroborated by the subsequent interaction (‘You mind my business?’). In other words, the elderly man’s deontic authority to intervene was resisted by the young woman (Stevanovic and Peräkylä, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%