2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13486-9_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pragmatic Approach to Semantic Repositories Benchmarking

Abstract: Abstract. The aim of this paper is to benchmark various semantic repositories in order to evaluate their deployment in a commercial image retrieval and browsing application. We adopt a two-phase approach for evaluating the target semantic repositories: analytical parameters such as query language and reasoning support are used to select the pool of the target repositories, and practical parameters such as load and query response times are used to select the best match to application requirements. In addition t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopted OWLIM (GeoSpatial 2013) to host our semantic knowledgebase as it offers non-restricted and well-supported version for academic use. OWLIM also scored very well in terms of response-time and recall in a benchmarking investigation we performed in partnership with the Press Association (Thakker et al 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We adopted OWLIM (GeoSpatial 2013) to host our semantic knowledgebase as it offers non-restricted and well-supported version for academic use. OWLIM also scored very well in terms of response-time and recall in a benchmarking investigation we performed in partnership with the Press Association (Thakker et al 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Various works also compare these RDF data stores [17][18][19][20][21]. In addition to comparing the RDF stores, RDF loaders are also compared in [22]. Distinct from our work; [17][18][19] use generated data, [17,18] use insufficiently low data for the performance evaluation, [17][18][19][20]22] do not use medical data, and [19,22] compare both AllegroGraph and Oracle 12c.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data layer also contains a semantic repository that allows storing the ontologies and performing reasoning. OWLIM was chosen due to scalability reasons [6] as the system is required to reason over a large number of tunnels and inspection data. The system also contains a relational database in the form of MySQL to store inspection and result data for caching purpose.…”
Section: Fig 1 Padtun System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%