2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pragmatic approach to define the ecological potential of water bodies heavily modified by the presence of ports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that the assessment scale in this study was lessened in comparison to the scale for NWBs since the environmental objectives for HMWBs and AWBs should be less strict than for NWBs. Likewise, in the case of transitional water bodies, Borja et al [51] found that present MEP values should lie at around 75% of the natural reference conditions for biological quality elements, while Ondiviela et al [52] calculated MEP as the 90th, 75th or 25th percentile value calculated at reference sites with undisturbed or minimally disturbed hydromorphological conditions.…”
Section: Selection Of Indicators For the Assessment Of Hydromorpholog...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that the assessment scale in this study was lessened in comparison to the scale for NWBs since the environmental objectives for HMWBs and AWBs should be less strict than for NWBs. Likewise, in the case of transitional water bodies, Borja et al [51] found that present MEP values should lie at around 75% of the natural reference conditions for biological quality elements, while Ondiviela et al [52] calculated MEP as the 90th, 75th or 25th percentile value calculated at reference sites with undisturbed or minimally disturbed hydromorphological conditions.…”
Section: Selection Of Indicators For the Assessment Of Hydromorpholog...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the real environmental conditions should be quantified through a regular monitoring of the environmental quality. Traditionally, the evaluation of the quality of water systems has been conducted by sampling and laboratory analysis and abiotic and biotic indices (Ponti et al, 2009;Ondiviela et al, 2013). Nowadays, data of environmental quality from monitoring programs, satellite images or forecast models could be used to calibrate the MERA process.…”
Section: Challenges Of Applying Mera At a Global Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, port facilities are types of activities that can result in a water body designated as a Heavily Modified Water Body (HMWB, Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC, WFD). Human activities to support specific uses (e.g., navigation) have indeed caused physical alterations (i.e., dredging, confinement) in the water body (i.e., port) basically modifying its hydromorphological properties (Ondiviela et al, 2012(Ondiviela et al, , 2013. The peculiar features of HMWBs justify the development of monitoring and remediation programs specific and adequate to port characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%