2013
DOI: 10.1109/tlt.2013.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practice-Oriented Review of Learning Objects

Abstract: Publisher: IEEE This document has been downloaded from MUEP (https://muep.mah.se) / DIVA (https://mau.diva-portal.org).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
29

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
26
0
29
Order By: Relevance
“…Expert review Policy Atkins et al, 2007;Catteau et al, 2008;Kurilovas, 2009;Sanz-Rodríquez et al, 2010;Kumar et al, 2005;Westbrook et al, 2012;Nielsen, 1994;Clements & Pawlowski, 2012; Quality benchmarking Policy Atkins et al, 2007;Balagué & Saarti, 2009;Wilson & Town, 2006; Quality guideline or criteria Policy Leacock & Nesbit, 2007;Babalhavaeji et al, 2010;Sinclair et al, 2013;Vargo et al, 2003;Defude & Farhat, 2005;Boskic, 2003;Kurilovas, 2009;Westbrook et al, 2012;Babalhavaeji et al, 2010;Dobratz et al, 2007 approaches in quality assurance are moving towards specific quality instruments rather than checking the quality of the materials against criteria by experts. However, the lack of a powerful community to back up the collaborative instruments (Zervas et al, 2014), expert review would be a vital part in assuring the quality of the resources.…”
Section: Quality Approaches Characteristics Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Expert review Policy Atkins et al, 2007;Catteau et al, 2008;Kurilovas, 2009;Sanz-Rodríquez et al, 2010;Kumar et al, 2005;Westbrook et al, 2012;Nielsen, 1994;Clements & Pawlowski, 2012; Quality benchmarking Policy Atkins et al, 2007;Balagué & Saarti, 2009;Wilson & Town, 2006; Quality guideline or criteria Policy Leacock & Nesbit, 2007;Babalhavaeji et al, 2010;Sinclair et al, 2013;Vargo et al, 2003;Defude & Farhat, 2005;Boskic, 2003;Kurilovas, 2009;Westbrook et al, 2012;Babalhavaeji et al, 2010;Dobratz et al, 2007 approaches in quality assurance are moving towards specific quality instruments rather than checking the quality of the materials against criteria by experts. However, the lack of a powerful community to back up the collaborative instruments (Zervas et al, 2014), expert review would be a vital part in assuring the quality of the resources.…”
Section: Quality Approaches Characteristics Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological, Social Atenas & Havemann, 2014;Clements & Pawlowski, 2012;Downes, 2007;Richter & Ehlers, 2010;Atkins et al, 2007;Sinclair et al, 2013;Vargo et al, 2003;Defude & Farhat, 2005;Kumar et al, 2005;Alharbi et al, 2011; Recommender systems (featured resources)…”
Section: Lorqaf -Specific Quality Instruments Quality Approaches Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also define reusability as "the ability to use the same resource multiple times in multiple ways and in multiple contexts" (Robson, 2006). Reusability is considered by Wiley (2000) as the fundamental idea behind LOs, and although some authors do not include explicit references to reusability in their definition, it is considered an implicit requirement by many (Sinclair et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that directories of open access repositories worldwide (DOARW) are the tools that will help find repositories that contain some LOs − henceforth referred to as LORs, despite the fact that some authors use the acronym LOR to refer to the repositories of learning objects such as MERLOT, JORUM, etc. (Sinclair et al, 2013;Clements and Pawlowski, 2012;McGreal, 2004). Once the LORs are identified, teachers can find needed LOs in the LOR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation