2006
DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32014-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Tool to Learn From Defects in Patient Care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More importantly, Ͻ 1% of errors were associated with a change or implementation of a procedure or policy, an action that may have a long-lasting opportunity to prevent medication errors. Research is needed to evaluate the extent to which efforts implemented in response to errors actually reduce the probability that the event will recur (25). Equally important, patients/family members were notified about medication errors Ͻ 3% of the time.…”
Section: Actions Takenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, Ͻ 1% of errors were associated with a change or implementation of a procedure or policy, an action that may have a long-lasting opportunity to prevent medication errors. Research is needed to evaluate the extent to which efforts implemented in response to errors actually reduce the probability that the event will recur (25). Equally important, patients/family members were notified about medication errors Ͻ 3% of the time.…”
Section: Actions Takenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of this tool have been published previously. 66 More common tools that the Institute of Medicine has advocated for identifying hazards are incident reporting systems. 1 These systems are used at the local, hospital, and national levels (macroscopic), and they target broad or specific event types or clinical areas.…”
Section: Retrospective Identification Of Hazardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…78 Efforts to evaluate the extent of risk reduction from other system changes are virtually nonexistent. 66 …”
Section: Mitigating Hazardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 Briefly, CUSP assesses safety culture, involves staff in identifying and mitigating safety hazards and investigating defects; 48 assigns a senior hospital leader to support unit-level safety activities; and provides tools to improve communication, teamwork, and other areas that pose safety hazards. 24,[48][49][50][51] Some other approaches to improving culture include operating room briefings; 52,53 executive walkrounds; 45,54 simulation; situation, background, assessment, and recommendation; 55 and culture debriefings. 56 Most of these tools are incorporated into the CUSP program.…”
Section: How Often Do Patients Receive Recommended Therapies?mentioning
confidence: 99%