“…MR images were analyzed by a well experienced radiologist (MA) using previously published classification systems [1,11,17,18]. The radiologist, who was blinded to all clinical information but the level of TESI, firstly, analyzed if DH existed, secondly, the type of DH (protrusion or extrusion), thirdly, the location of DH (central, subarticular, foraminal and extraforaminal) according to Fardon and Milette [19] and finally, the grade of nerve compression according to Pfirmann et al [1,11,18]. The subjects were classified as: no DH (n = 15), protrusion (n = 57) and extrusion (n = 27), and as: central (n = 15), subarticular (n = 45), foraminal (n = 18) and extraforaminal (n = 6) DH.…”