2010
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.09.2772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical MRI Grading System for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis

Abstract: The new grading system for foraminal stenosis of the lumbar spine showed nearly perfect interobserver and intraobserver agreement and would be helpful for clinical study and routine practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
250
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 340 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
250
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…MR images were analyzed by a well experienced radiologist (MA) using previously published classification systems [1,11,17,18]. The radiologist, who was blinded to all clinical information but the level of TESI, firstly, analyzed if DH existed, secondly, the type of DH (protrusion or extrusion), thirdly, the location of DH (central, subarticular, foraminal and extraforaminal) according to Fardon and Milette [19] and finally, the grade of nerve compression according to Pfirmann et al [1,11,18]. The subjects were classified as: no DH (n = 15), protrusion (n = 57) and extrusion (n = 27), and as: central (n = 15), subarticular (n = 45), foraminal (n = 18) and extraforaminal (n = 6) DH.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…MR images were analyzed by a well experienced radiologist (MA) using previously published classification systems [1,11,17,18]. The radiologist, who was blinded to all clinical information but the level of TESI, firstly, analyzed if DH existed, secondly, the type of DH (protrusion or extrusion), thirdly, the location of DH (central, subarticular, foraminal and extraforaminal) according to Fardon and Milette [19] and finally, the grade of nerve compression according to Pfirmann et al [1,11,18]. The subjects were classified as: no DH (n = 15), protrusion (n = 57) and extrusion (n = 27), and as: central (n = 15), subarticular (n = 45), foraminal (n = 18) and extraforaminal (n = 6) DH.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foraminal nerve compression was assessed using a system introduced by Lee et al [1]. Grade I applied when perineural fat was obliterated in two opposing directions (vertical or transverse), Grade II when perineural fat was obliterated in four directions without morphologic distortion of the nerve root, and Grade III when distortion or other morphologic change in the nerve root was evident.…”
Section: Nerve Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They focused on the degree of epidural fat obliteration but did not consider direct nerve root compression or deformity. Recently, Lee et al 3 reported a new grading system for lumbar spinal foraminal stenosis. They considered the type of stenosis, the amount of fat obliteration, and the presence of nerve root compression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%