2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical means for calibrating an LED-based photometric stereo system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large variety of solutions have been proposed, including assuming mechanically calibrated arrangements for domes and rings [RTF∗04], using known calibration objects [GCD∗18, Mac15, CCC08, MDA02, GCD∗17], and/or autocalibration techniques that reconstruct illumination parameters by making assumptions on the image reflectance field [WMTG05, XDW15, PF14, GCD∗18] or on the light form factor [ASSS14, USTY15, PCGG16, XSJ∗15]. Ackermann et al [AFG13] present a validation through error statistics of both a forward and backward geometric point light source calibration by using sets of different numbers of reflective spheres, showing that significant errors are present even in common use cases just for the identification of light position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large variety of solutions have been proposed, including assuming mechanically calibrated arrangements for domes and rings [RTF∗04], using known calibration objects [GCD∗18, Mac15, CCC08, MDA02, GCD∗17], and/or autocalibration techniques that reconstruct illumination parameters by making assumptions on the image reflectance field [WMTG05, XDW15, PF14, GCD∗18] or on the light form factor [ASSS14, USTY15, PCGG16, XSJ∗15]. Ackermann et al [AFG13] present a validation through error statistics of both a forward and backward geometric point light source calibration by using sets of different numbers of reflective spheres, showing that significant errors are present even in common use cases just for the identification of light position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near‐lighting photometric stereo PS estimates surface normals from two or more images with a fixed camera but differing lighting conditions [XSJ*]. Many PS methods assume that a light arrives from a distant source, which forms parallel light rays.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, there are few calibration procedures taking into account these phenomena. In [67], Xie et al use a single pattern, which is partially specular and partially Lambertian, to calibrate a LED. We intend to improve this procedure using two patterns, one specular and the other Lambertian.…”
Section: Calibrating the Luminous Flux Emitted By A Ledmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can also be achieved online, by introducing spheres in the scene to reconstruct [37]. Calibrating anisotropy is a more challenging problem, which was tackled recently in [48,67] by using images of a planar surface. Some photometric stereo methods also circumvent calibration by (partly or completely) automatically inferring lighting during the 3D-reconstruction process [36,37,38,44,51,57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%