2009
DOI: 10.1177/160940690900800107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Practical Iterative Framework for Qualitative Data Analysis

Abstract: The role of iteration in qualitative data analysis, not as a repetitive mechanical task but as a reflexive process, is key to sparking insight and developing meaning. In this paper the authors presents a simple framework for qualitative data analysis comprising three iterative questions. The authors developed it to analyze qualitative data and to engage with the process of continuous meaning-making and progressive focusing inherent to analysis processes. They briefly present the framework and locate it within … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
530
0
14

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 884 publications
(614 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
530
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…to engage in identity boundary work). The themes youth discussed aligned well with the themes we identified in the video analysis, which enhanced our finding's crystallization, resonance, rigor, and credibility (Srivastava & Hopwood, 2009;Tracy,2010).…”
Section: Phase 3 Evidence Of Identity Boundary Work In Youths' Intermentioning
confidence: 70%
“…to engage in identity boundary work). The themes youth discussed aligned well with the themes we identified in the video analysis, which enhanced our finding's crystallization, resonance, rigor, and credibility (Srivastava & Hopwood, 2009;Tracy,2010).…”
Section: Phase 3 Evidence Of Identity Boundary Work In Youths' Intermentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Data from students' reflective journals were analysed through coding procedures from grounded theory: concepts in the data were identified and named, and then grouped at a more abstract level into categories applying the constant comparison methods from Glaser and Strauss (1967). We supplemented the emerging result with content analysis of textual data from the researcher's memos and transcriptions of the expert panel and participant meetings, as recommended by Elo and Kyngäs (2008) and Srivastava and Hopwood (2009). Through memoing during coding, the process eventually developed in abstraction to find relationships between the categories identified, and finally a story (or core category) was developed as a generalised relationship.…”
Section: Qualitative Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis was therefore carried out as a qualitative text analysis based on the interview transcripts. The material was interpreted with support from concepts derived from the theoretical framework, and analyzed through an iterative process [27] where the developing categorization was influenced by the empirical findings as well as previous conceptualizations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%