2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-022-04449-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical intrusion detection system based on denoising autoencoder and LightGBM classifier with improved detection performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, authors proposed classification techniques that were tested using the CIC-IDS2017 dataset. The proposed ensemble classifier technique of [ 47 ] achieved 86.5% accuracy, while model presented in [ 66 ] achieved 99.86% accuracy. Other techniques that were proposed in [ 25 , 34 , 48 , 49 ], received, 97.72%, 99.89%, 99.95%, and 98.62%accuracy, while our proposed scheme is 99.98% accurate during the classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, authors proposed classification techniques that were tested using the CIC-IDS2017 dataset. The proposed ensemble classifier technique of [ 47 ] achieved 86.5% accuracy, while model presented in [ 66 ] achieved 99.86% accuracy. Other techniques that were proposed in [ 25 , 34 , 48 , 49 ], received, 97.72%, 99.89%, 99.95%, and 98.62%accuracy, while our proposed scheme is 99.98% accurate during the classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayubkhan et al 22 Developed LightGBM-DAE classifier for noise removal and feature learning enhancement.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several existing approaches are considered for comparison, including EPK-DNN, 16 IMOPSO, 17 AIDS-HML, 19 PSO+KNN, 20 PSO+ANN, 20 FSACM, 21 LightGBM-DAE, 22 HTF-DS, 24 DHMLM, 25 SGM, 26 and HDL 27 using NADS datasets.…”
Section: Evaluation Based On Nads Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we examine various autoencoder architectures discussed in the literature pertaining to the task of network traffic anomaly detection. We select a set of frequently encountered autoencoder models in the NIDS domain [5], [6], [8], [9]. The notations used in explaining the autoencoderbased techniques are summarized in Table I.…”
Section: Review Of Different Autoencoder Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%