2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A practical guide to managing CT findings in the breast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the segmentation accuracy, precision, and recall rate of the algorithm in this study were significantly greater than those of the SE-Res Block U-shaped CNN algorithm and density peak clustering algorithm (P < 0.05). Such results were similar to the research results of Al-Katib et al [21], indicating that the CNN segmentation algorithm used in this study showed better segmentation performance for CT images than traditional algorithms and had clinical application value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It was found that the segmentation accuracy, precision, and recall rate of the algorithm in this study were significantly greater than those of the SE-Res Block U-shaped CNN algorithm and density peak clustering algorithm (P < 0.05). Such results were similar to the research results of Al-Katib et al [21], indicating that the CNN segmentation algorithm used in this study showed better segmentation performance for CT images than traditional algorithms and had clinical application value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, the number of newly registered breast cancers increased, without reaching statistical significance (p=0.41), although in Romania there are no screening programs for breast cancer. CT studies for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia incidentally found macro calcifications and tumor masses in the breasts [16], which therefore increased the number of newly registered cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed tomography (CT) has always been considered an inaccurate method for breast evaluation; however many studies have shown that conventional chest CT is able to detect malignant breast lesions 3–10 . Dedicated CT devices developed for breast assessment, using technologies, such as “cone beam” and “phase contrast,” have shown promising results 11–14 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Computed tomography (CT) has always been considered an inaccurate method for breast evaluation; however many studies have shown that conventional chest CT is able to detect malignant breast lesions. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Dedicated CT devices developed for breast assessment, using technologies, such as "cone beam" and "phase contrast," have shown promising results. [11][12][13][14] However, only few studies have evaluated the performance of conventional multide-tector CT (MDCT) devices in the evaluation of breast lesions (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%